Teams

Forest Lakes

2022 Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over Women · Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-20vs GlenmoreLost 01
L#2 DoublesLynette Sanford / Marie Moss vs Donna Horn / Susan Cabell Mains5-7, 3-6
2022-07-18vs GlenmoreSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristine Eagleson / Shauna Hogg vs Tamara Freeman / Sarah McCall6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLynette Sanford / Denika Gum vs Andrea Richardson / Allison Egidi6-0, 6-4
2022-07-15vs The Fun Bunch - BHSCWon 10
W#3 DoublesLynette Sanford / Shauna Hogg vs Susan Knight / Jannemieke Keener7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2022-07-13vs BH - UnitedLost 01
L#3 DoublesShauna Hogg / Denika Gum vs Abbie Oliver / Patricia Irby3-6, 4-6
2022-06-24vs BH - UnitedLost 01
L#3 DoublesSusan Wall / Shauna Hogg vs Melissa Hoover / Ellen Ochs2-6, 2-6
2022-06-22vs GlenmoreWon 20
W#1 SinglesShauna Hogg vs Christina Meyer4-2
W#3 DoublesLynette Sanford / Marie Moss vs Andrea Richardson / Allison Egidi6-1, 6-3
2022-06-15vs The Fun Bunch - BHSCLost 01
L#3 DoublesBeth Kohler / Shauna Hogg vs Wendi Ruschmann / Karen Overman0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Stephanie Hall
published
2.80
Kelly Guyton
published
2.72
Lynette Sanford
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.69
Judy Roy
published
2.60
2.54
Marie Moss
published
2.24
Shauna Hogg
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 2.5
2.06
Beth Kohler
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynette Sanford + Shauna Hogg151054% games+2.8% vs expected
Christine Eagleson + Judy Roy033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Hall
14W–17L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Kelly Guyton
10W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Lynette Sanford
93W–90L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.72
Judy Roy
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.69
3
Christine Eagleson
0W–12L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
2.60
Marie Moss
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
2.54
2.5
Shauna Hogg
41W–99L career · 6 lines in 2022
0%98%2%
2.24
2.5
Beth Kohler
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.