Teams

BHSC-Hapgood

2024 Charlottesville Adult Other 55 Doubles · Charlottesville Adult Other 55 Doubles 7.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-08vs Glenmore-LongWon 10
W#2 DoublesMerrily Main D'Arpino / Pascale Hapgood vs Patti Rowe / Shirlee Randall4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-11-06vs ACAC ElyWon 10
W#1 DoublesMerrily Main D'Arpino / Laura Leetzow vs Victoria Tremaglio / Judith Ely6-3, 6-4
2024-10-25Won 10
W#2 DoublesMerrily Main D'Arpino / Michele Rowan vs Deborah Smith / Elizabeth Black6-1, 6-2
2024-10-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesMerrily Main D'Arpino / Amy Taggart vs Diana Ferguson / Kathleen Long4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-10-14vs Glenmore-LongWon 10
W#2 DoublesPascale Hapgood / Merrily Main D'Arpino vs Patti Rowe / Virginia Bowie5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2024-10-11vs Forest Lakes Net Girls-LearyLost 01
L#1 DoublesAllison Ewing / Amy Taggart vs Susie Abramson / Lisa Marshall7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2024-10-04vs ACAC ElyWon 10
W#2 DoublesMerrily Main D'Arpino / Pascale Hapgood vs Elizabeth Black / Susan Bayliss5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-09-20vs Forest Lakes Net Girls-LearyWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Taggart / Merrily Main D'Arpino vs Judith Divita / Elizabeth Gunnels6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult Other 55 Doubles 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Laura Leetzow
published
3.26
Allison Ewing
published 3.5
3.14
Merrily Main D'Arpino
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.12
Cathie Ricketts
published 3.5
3.12
Amy Taggart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Jeanne Ward
published
3.04
Mary Anne Burns
published
Grace Bartini
published
Michele Rowan
published
Pascale Hapgood
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Merrily Main D'Arpino + Amy Taggart11755% games−4.8% vs expected
Laura Leetzow + Jeanne Ward213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Leetzow
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Allison Ewing
16W–17L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Merrily Main D'Arpino
150W–107L career · 9 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Cathie Ricketts
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Amy Taggart
141W–98L career · 3 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
Jeanne Ward
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
Mary Anne Burns
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
Grace Bartini
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michele Rowan
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Pascale Hapgood
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.