Teams

CCV BLUE

2023 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - DAYTIME

5 players · average NTRP 3.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-20vs HRCA-S YELLOWSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMonica Bogue / Maureen Breitenbach vs Sherri Partlow / Maria Banta7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJill Filene / Melanie Weitzenfeld vs Jennifer Jackson / Christina Schwartz0-6, 1-6
2023-06-13vs PRKR GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesAshley Wilson / Jill Filene vs Christina D'Lallo / Leslie Henderson6-2, 6-2
2023-06-06vs CPV REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesJill Filene / Melanie Weitzenfeld vs Eva Field / Elizabeth Zeller6-2, 6-4
2023-05-30vs PRC NAVYWon 10
W#2 DoublesMaureen Breitenbach / Jill Filene vs Liz Holt / Kristen Crookshanks6-3, 7-6
2023-05-23vs HRCA-S GOLDLost 02
L#1 DoublesMaureen Breitenbach / Melissa Rogers vs Cherie Weren / Tanya Cote4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAllyson Ross / Melanie Weitzenfeld vs Kimberly Bevill / Marla Schroeder2-6, 3-6
2023-05-16vs SS-LT GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesMonica Bogue / Melanie Weitzenfeld vs Emily Fujita / Carmel Walz1-6, 2-6
2023-05-09vs VCC REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesMaureen Breitenbach / Melissa Rogers vs Lindsey Talaga / Kathy Dosen7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJill Filene / Melanie Weitzenfeld vs Patti Akright / Karen Blach6-3, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Ashley Wilson
published 4
3.40
Jill Filene
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.22
Melanie Weitzenfeld
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.20
Maureen Breitenbach
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Monica Bogue
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maureen Breitenbach + Jill Filene6073% games+14.7% vs expected
Melanie Weitzenfeld + Jill Filene6350% gamesnot enough data
Monica Bogue + Jill Filene314 matchesnot enough data
Maureen Breitenbach + Melanie Weitzenfeld213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ashley Wilson
16W–19L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.63
3.5
Jill Filene
115W–55L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Melanie Weitzenfeld
63W–53L career · 5 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Maureen Breitenbach
80W–54L career · 4 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Monica Bogue
20W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.