Teams

Terrell 6.5 Combo 40s Thurs AM

2023 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Women 40 & Over

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-05vs Clancy 6.5 Combo 40s Thurs AMWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelinda Billings / Susan Roach vs Debbie Clancy / Britt Molitoris6-1, 6-4
2023-09-28vs Taylordean 6.5 Combo 40s Thurs AMWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Roach / Claire Driscoll vs Gracia Tilley / Katharina Welborn6-3, 6-0
2023-09-07vs Baker 6.5 Combo 40s Thurs AMWon 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Roach / Lindsey Whitlatch vs Holly Jones / Vania Robinson6-3, 6-2
2023-08-31vs Clancy 6.5 Combo 40s Thurs AMLost 01
L#1 DoublesMeghan Hilleboe / Susan Roach vs Julie Dover / Elisabeth Kraska1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-08-24vs Taylordean 6.5 Combo 40s Thurs AMLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Roach / Annetta Bartle vs Cameron Wannamaker / Page Kreager6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2023-08-03vs Baker 6.5 Combo 40s Thurs AMWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Roach / Reeves Rhoten vs Melissa Baker / Ashley Raley7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Lori Harrington
published
3.59
Susan Roach
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
3.54
Natalie Harris
published
3.35
Reeves Rhoten
published
Andrea Pollina
published 3.5
3.17
Claire Driscoll
published 3.5
3.05
Meghan Hilleboe
published
3.04
Mary Winstead
published
2.94
Melanie Burns
published
2.85
Annetta Bartle
published 3
2.78
Gail Terrell
published 3
2.72
Lindsey Whitlatch
published
Kelly Pryzwansky
published
Leann Spencer
published
Melinda Billings
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Annetta Bartle + Gail Terrell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Harrington
47W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%23%77%
3.59
Susan Roach
122W–43L career · 11 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.59
Natalie Harris
48W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.54
Reeves Rhoten
30W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Andrea Pollina
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Claire Driscoll
15W–27L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
Meghan Hilleboe
9W–15L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.05
Mary Winstead
16W–22L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
Melanie Burns
27W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%32%
2.94
3
Annetta Bartle
15W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Gail Terrell
18W–13L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.78
Lindsey Whitlatch
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
2.72
Kelly Pryzwansky
15W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Leann Spencer
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melinda Billings
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.