Teams

MacLean

2026 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 40 & OVER · WOMEN 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 2.71 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-25vs Cannon CFCCLost 04
L#1 DoublesLauren Hollett-Mott / Amanda Holliday vs Ashley Basinger / Helen Wells6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAmy Ford vs Sarah Gwathmey4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJen MacLean / Katrina Summers vs Jessica Cannon / Ashley Woolwine1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Saile / Penelope Taylor vs Anne Tilghman Reiss / Margaret Holmes4-6, 1-6
2026-05-12vs Pierson 40+ 3.0 SpringLost 04
L#1 DoublesAmy Ford / Emily Mussell vs Susan Ferrell / Julia Vogt2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJaime Helms vs Shelley Livengood3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJulia Huffman / Katrina Summers vs Jeannie Fitzgerald / Alisa Cowan1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJen MacLean / Beth Bianchi vs Shanna Bradshaw / Lori Herring1-6, 1-6
2026-05-05vs Russell/McCain 3.0 Spring 2026Lost 04
L#1 DoublesJulie Koehler / Amanda Holliday vs Alicia Rineer / Shannon Russell0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Ford vs Christine Feeney3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKatrina Summers / Denise Heye vs Kara Gansmann / Pamela Vest0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Bianchi / Nicole Aristy vs Yuko McDonald / Katie Ragan2-6, 1-6
2026-05-03vs King/Reeves 40+ SpringWon 31
L#1 DoublesLo DeWalt / Amanda Holliday vs Jennifer Blanchard / Wendy Downing5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesBeth Saile vs Becky Benson7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Ford / Lauren Hollett-Mott vs Stacie Genatiempo / Brenda Reeves6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBeth Bianchi / Denise Heye vs Sheila Finnicum / Valerie Oldfield7-5, 6-3
2026-04-16vs WagnerAndoSplit 22
W#1 DoublesEmily Mussell / Amanda Holliday vs Stephanie Wagner / Sandra Cerra6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesPenelope Taylor vs Katharine Hawthorne4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJaime Helms / Beth Saile vs Kimberly Hutchins / Ashley Cahn6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDenise Heye / Katrina Summers vs Joelle Ando / Heather Black7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2026-03-12vs Malone/Drennan (40) 3.0Lost 04
L#1 DoublesJaime Helms / Emily Mussell vs Leslie Houston / Karen Galey3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Ford vs Patricia Furbay0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Saile / Julia Huffman vs Brandy Baird / Larissa Malone3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDenise Heye / Beth Bianchi vs Faye Serkin / Diana Lancaster0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Lauren Hollett-Mott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.71
Emily Mussell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.47
Beth Saile
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.41
Amanda Holliday
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.39
Jaime Helms
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.39
Nicole Aristy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.39
Jen MacLean
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.36
Julia Huffman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Penelope Taylor
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.23
Amy Ford
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.20
Lo DeWalt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.05
Katrina Summers
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.02
Denise Heye
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
1.93
Beth Bianchi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Saile + Amanda Holliday2343% games+0.5% vs expected
Lo DeWalt + Amanda Holliday134 matchesnot enough data
Penelope Taylor + Jen MacLean033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Hollett-Mott
10W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Emily Mussell
25W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Beth Saile
19W–27L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.47
2.5
Amanda Holliday
27W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%76%24%
2.41
2.5
Jaime Helms
19W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.39
Nicole Aristy
12W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.39
Jen MacLean
6W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.39
Julia Huffman
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.36
Penelope Taylor
4W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
2.27
2.5
Amy Ford
12W–34L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23
Lo DeWalt
13W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.20
Katrina Summers
6W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05
3
Denise Heye
1W–9L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.02
2.5
Beth Bianchi
1W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.