Teams

YTC: Service With a Smile

2026 18&Over Women Day Fall · 3.0 Day

10 players · average NTRP 2.83 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-25Won 10
W#3 DoublesAdriana Agdamus / Amy Listerman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-11-18vs Maximum TennisLost 01
L#2 DoublesAmy Listerman / Ali Moss vs Chrissy Jee / Nicole Porell0-6, 1-6
2025-11-10vs Scarsdale Golf ClubSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmy Listerman / Michele DelGiudice vs Melissa Wetzstein / Tracy Lazarus1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Tomanek / Marsha Hager vs Lauren Mintzer / Ann Gallagher6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Listerman / Ali Moss vs Gillian Driscoll / Jessica Hunt4-6, 1-6
2025-10-08vs TIA 3.0 PurpleLost 02
L#1 DoublesCaitlin Chang / Amy Listerman vs Angela Giuffra / Stephanie Manheim1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMarsha Hager / Nancy Tomanek vs Cristy Eguiluz / Mary Beth MacAulay3-6, 3-6
2025-10-07vs Westchester CCLost 12
W#1 DoublesMaria DelGiudice / Amy Listerman vs Maureen O'Connor / Molly Cahill6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDorothy Dunn / Marsha Hager vs Deborah Maresca / Lauren Julian4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMichele DelGiudice / Olivia Donovan vs Allison Brucato / Danielle Martell3-6, 5-7
2025-09-30vs Matchpoint: Rockland RacquetsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesCaitlin Chang / Amy Listerman vs Malki Gartenberg / Esther Adler6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAnna Fontana / Nancy Tomanek vs Amy Higby / Pearl Kahan1-6, 1-6
2025-09-16vs YTC: T's MisfitsWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Listerman / Adriana Agdamus vs Karen Arnett / Kathleen Starr6-2, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Maria DelGiudice
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Caitlin Chang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Michele DelGiudice
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
2.56
Adriana Agdamus
published 3
2.51
Marsha Hager
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Amy Listerman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.39
Ali Moss
published 2.5
2.25
Anna Fontana
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.99
Nancy Tomanek
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adriana Agdamus + Marsha Hager2448% games+8.1% vs expected
Amy Listerman + Caitlin Chang0533% games−4.7% vs expected
Adriana Agdamus + Amy Listerman2729% games−6.7% vs expected
Adriana Agdamus + Ali Moss123 matchesnot enough data
Amy Listerman + Marsha Hager033 matchesnot enough data
Amy Listerman + Ali Moss213 matchesnot enough data
Michele DelGiudice + Anna Fontana213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria DelGiudice
26W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.19
3
Caitlin Chang
17W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Michele DelGiudice
14W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%1%
2.65
3
Deanna Landivar Ruiz
3W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61
3
Adriana Agdamus
17W–54L career · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.56
Marsha Hager
11W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
2.51
3
Amy Listerman
41W–90L career · 8 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.47
2.5
Ali Moss
5W–13L career · no lines in 2026
0%78%22%
2.39
2.5
Anna Fontana
12W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
Nancy Tomanek
6W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.