Teams

Diamondhead - Wilkerson

2025 Mixed 55 & Over-GC · 3.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-22vs Newman-TOCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesPamela Hymel / Michael Wellman vs Carolyn Freeman / William Moore4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJo Ann Lozes / William Warren vs Connie Johnston / John Cleary6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJane Bearden / William Lingsch vs Toni Fillmore / James Whitney2-6, 0-6
2025-07-08vs BBTC - KNIGHT/BAUGHMANWon 21
W#1 DoublesRhonda Lohmeyer / Jan Lohmeyer vs David Boggs / Amy Knight4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCheryl King / Freddie Wilkerson vs Mike Cooper / Laurie Baughman4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Wilkerson / Michael Wellman vs David Baughman / Cindy Creel6-1, 6-3
2025-07-07vs BBTC - KNIGHT/BAUGHMANWon 21
W#1 DoublesJo Ann Lozes / Michael Wellman vs Laurie Baughman / David Baughman7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKaren Wilkerson / ED LOZES vs Amy Knight / David Boggs5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCheryl King / Freddie Wilkerson vs Anne Warren / Douglas Vaughn6-1, 6-2
2025-07-02vs Myrick 55 - OSTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesJo Ann Lozes / ED LOZES vs Ellen Berry / John Greer1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRhonda Lohmeyer / Jan Lohmeyer vs Billie Macnaughton / Charlie Neumann6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJane Bearden / Freddie Wilkerson vs Jan Roberts / Harold Roberts3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-06-17vs BBTC - KNIGHT/BAUGHMANWon 21
L#1 DoublesRhonda Lohmeyer / Jan Lohmeyer vs Lee Ann Hunter / Marty Warren5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesPamela Hymel / William Warren vs Cindy Creel / David Boggs6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Wilkerson / Freddie Wilkerson vs Amy Knight / Mike Cooper3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-06-12vs Newman-TOCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Wilkerson / Freddie Wilkerson vs Carolyn Freeman / John Cleary7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJane Bearden / William Warren vs Toni Fillmore / James Whitney2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCheryl King / William Lingsch vs Terry OConnor / William Moore3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-02vs Myrick 55 - OSTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesPamela Hymel / Michael Wellman vs Trista Nash / David Spencer6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJo Ann Lozes / Freddie Wilkerson vs Ellen Berry / Charlie Neumann6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJane Bearden / William Warren vs Jan Roberts / David Rodriguez7-5, 6-2
2025-05-27vs Newman-TOCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesPamela Hymel / Michael Wellman vs Connie Johnston / John Cleary6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKaren Wilkerson / Freddie Wilkerson vs James Whitney / Toni Fillmore6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJane Bearden / William Warren vs Lisa Chapman / Robbie Johnson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-12vs Myrick 55 - OSTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJo Ann Lozes / ED LOZES vs David Spencer / Jennifer Mitchell6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPamela Hymel / Michael Wellman vs Billie Macnaughton / Charlie Neumann6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJane Bearden / William Lingsch vs Monique Farrington / Allen Farrington6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Diamondhead - Wilkerson72161127225
2BBTC - KNIGHT/BAUGHMAN36111636276
3Myrick 55 - OSTC27101737275

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Freddie Wilkerson
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.99
Michael Wellman
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.98
Karen Wilkerson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.98
Rhonda Lohmeyer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
William Warren
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.83
Jan Lohmeyer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.73
ED LOZES
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Jo Ann Lozes
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.65
William Lingsch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Pamela Hymel
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jan Lohmeyer + Rhonda Lohmeyer8260% games+8.8% vs expected
Karen Wilkerson + Freddie Wilkerson19362% games+8.7% vs expected
Jo Ann Lozes + ED LOZES4449% gamesnot enough data
Michael Wellman + Pamela Hymel314 matchesnot enough data
ED LOZES + Karen Wilkerson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Freddie Wilkerson
40W–26L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
Michael Wellman
29W–31L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
Karen Wilkerson
47W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
Rhonda Lohmeyer
26W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
William Warren
15W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
2.86
Jan Lohmeyer
18W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
3
ED LOZES
9W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Jo Ann Lozes
19W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
William Lingsch
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
2.65
Pamela Hymel
17W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.