Teams

HCC -Turnes

2022 Hillsborough Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

6 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-02-12Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Turnes / Tish Wissel vs Kathleen Stein / Maria Drew5-7, 3-6
2022-02-07vs Hills - HCC/Street/IronsmithLost 01
L#2 DoublesSusan Williams / Mary Turnes vs Elizabeth Street / Lori Gonzalez2-6, 4-6
2022-01-29Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTish Wissel / Mary Turnes vs Jami Patterson / Kathleen Stein4-6, 2-6
2022-01-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Turnes / Andria Owen vs Maria Drew / Kathleen Stein5-7, 0-6
2022-01-08vs Hills - HCC/Street/IronsmithLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Turnes / Kendra Pallardy vs Lisa Freeman / Mary Paul4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Margaret Roset
published
4.26
Andria Owen
published 4.5
4.04
Ann Carlson
published 4.5
3.87
Mary Turnes
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.83
Tish Wissel
published
Susan Williams
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Roset
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Andria Owen
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
4.26
4.5
Ann Carlson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
4.04
Mary Turnes
33W–62L career · 5 lines in 2022
84%16%<1%
3.87
Tish Wissel
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
Susan Williams
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.