Teams

V - Valle Lindo Rockets

2021 SoCal Doubles 18 &Over · Ventura - Women 3.5 WE

11 players · average NTRP 3.20 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-12-19vs V - Spanish Hills BallersWon 10
W#2 DoublesStacy Ball / Deisy Lotz vs Sarah Smith / Wissal Buscemi6-3, 6-4
2021-12-11vs V - North Ranch Ace AngelsLost 01
L#1 DoublesLauren Napoli / Deisy Lotz vs Sonia Bekian / Lisa Iezza6-7, 0-6
2021-11-21vs V - WACky GirlsLost 01
L#3 DoublesHiromi Dever / Stacy Ball vs Lisa Shepard / Lisa Bedigian6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2021-11-14vs V - WAC M&M Fall 2021Won 10
W#2 DoublesLauren Napoli / Lindsey Rodman vs Valerie Brecker / Jackie Guinn6-4, 6-2
2021-11-06vs V - Sunset Hot ShotsLost 01
L#1 DoublesLauren Napoli / Lindsey Rodman vs Gina Vazquez / Deborah Cassar4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-10-24vs V - Royal AcesLost 01
L#3 DoublesStacy Ball / Hiromi Dever vs Michele Ploudre / Renee Kieselbach2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.5 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Lauren Napoli
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Lindsey Rodman
published
3.20
Marcie McTigue
published
3.19
Myla Hanson
published
3.10
Eva Ching Guo
published 3.5
3.08
Judy Liu
published
3.02
Julie Kurowski
published
2.98
Rhonda Mosser
published
2.93
Stacy Ball
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
Hiromi Dever
published 3
2.56
Deisy Lotz
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsey Rodman + Lauren Napoli7655% games+3.8% vs expected
Judy Liu + Marcie McTigue3346% games−8.4% vs expected
Judy Liu + Julie Kurowski0727% games−21.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lauren Napoli
144W–52L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%48%52%
3.51
Lindsey Rodman
6W–3L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.33
Marcie McTigue
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
Myla Hanson
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Eva Ching Guo
2W–11L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.10
Judy Liu
8W–16L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.08
Julie Kurowski
4W–16L career · no lines in 2021
45%55%<1%
3.02
Rhonda Mosser
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
57%43%<1%
2.98
3
Stacy Ball
131W–150L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Hiromi Dever
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Deisy Lotz
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.