Teams

IND - de Montbel - The Lobsters

2026 Charlottesville Mixed 18 & Over · Charlottesville Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-17vs ACAC - BaylissWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarcello de Montbel / Melissa Zeller vs Derek Frazier / Esther Bausserman7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHania Taha / Javier Tibau vs Susan Bayliss / Gabriel Ofiesh1-0
L#3 DoublesStephanie Radlick / Long Duong vs Gregory Parrish / Christina Meyer7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2026-05-15vs Glenmore - JohnstonWon 30
W#1 DoublesRakitha Chelliah / Stephanie Radlick vs Patti Rowe / Michael Sions6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHania Taha / Javier Tibau vs Michael Kaminski / Lynne Gibson6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMarcello de Montbel / Melissa Zeller vs Nick Minutella / Daniela Otto6-4, 7-5
2026-05-14vs BHSC - WelchWon 21
L#1 DoublesMarcello de Montbel / Melissa Zeller vs Allison Ewing / James Griffin6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Radlick / Rakitha Chelliah vs Anita McGinty / Logan Martin6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesElena Staguhn - * / Angel Santiago Torres vs Alanna Lewis / Todd Hochrein6-1, 6-4
2026-05-03vs FL - Jorgensen - Mid-Court CrisisLost 12
L#1 DoublesAngel Santiago Torres / Hania Taha vs Andreas Gahlmann / Jenny Furlow1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKrithika Shanmugasundaram / Paul Lorenzo vs Ben Jorgensen / Lynette Sanford3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMarcello de Montbel / Melissa Zeller vs Devin Lindhurst / Kelly Guyton6-3, 6-4
2026-04-26vs ACAC - BaylissSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLong Duong / Lori Gagnon vs Derek Frazier / Christina Meyer0-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesElena Staguhn / Javier Tibau vs Bill Irwin / Susan Bayliss6-0, 6-0
2026-04-24vs BHSC - WelchLost 12
L#1 DoublesAngel Santiago Torres / Stephanie Radlick vs Anita McGinty / James Griffin2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesRakitha Chelliah / Hania Taha vs Shannon Henderson / Todd Hochrein7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKrithika Shanmugasundaram / Javier Tibau vs Courtney Heyward / Matthew Reidenbach2-6, 3-6
2026-04-23vs Glenmore - JohnstonWon 21
W#1 DoublesPaul Lorenzo / Lori Gagnon vs Dalton Dorne / Sam Conner6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStephanie Radlick / Rakitha Chelliah vs Rebecca Wright / Will Sowers6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHania Taha / Angel Santiago Torres vs Michael Sions / Lynne Gibson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-29vs FL - Jorgensen - Mid-Court CrisisLost 12
L#1 DoublesJavier Tibau / Elena Staguhn vs Andreas Gahlmann / Jenny Furlow4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRakitha Chelliah / Hania Taha vs Amy Taggart / Devin Lindhurst1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarcello de Montbel / Krithika Shanmugasundaram vs Elizabeth Gunnels / Benjamin Baker4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Charlottesville Mixed 18 & Over 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FL - Jorgensen - Mid-Court Crisis53121225196
2IND - de Montbel - The Lobsters35121228211

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Elena Staguhn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.41
Stephanie Radlick
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.34
Angel Santiago Torres
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Lori Gagnon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Krithika Shanmugasundaram
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Melissa Zeller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Hania Taha
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.73
Long Duong
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Javier Tibau
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Marcello de Montbel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Paul Lorenzo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Rakitha Chelliah
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Zeller + Marcello de Montbel314 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Radlick + Rakitha Chelliah314 matchesnot enough data
Paul Lorenzo + Lori Gagnon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elena Staguhn
4W–2L career · type D · 6 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.79
Stephanie Radlick
7W–6L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
3.41
3.5
Angel Santiago Torres
53W–36L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.34
Lori Gagnon
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.15
Krithika Shanmugasundaram
1W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Melissa Zeller
121W–104L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Hania Taha
50W–28L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
Long Duong
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Javier Tibau
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marcello de Montbel
3W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Paul Lorenzo
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rakitha Chelliah
6W–3L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.