Teams

LAyala (Hornets Nest)

2026 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Men - Mon PM

6 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 SinglesJared McKiernan vs Christopher Gowin3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesPaul Fackler vs Shivam Desai6-3, 6-3
2026-07-13vs TBixler (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesJared McKiernan vs Matthew Glapiak7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesPete Eakin vs Thomas Bixler3-6, 5-7
2026-07-06vs WTiedeman/KGreen (Park Road)Lost 12
W#1 SinglesLUIS AYALA vs Jason Rickel6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJordan Paterra vs Jackson Tiedeman2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesVaughn Schmutz vs Matthew Baum2-6, 6-7
2026-06-22vs JOlmstead (Mason Wallace)Won 30
W#1 SinglesPete Eakin vs Jesse Olmstead6-0, 6-4
W#2 SinglesPaul Fackler vs Adrian Mendoza6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesVaughn Schmutz vs Anthony Duda6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-15Won 10
W#3 SinglesJordan Paterra vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-08vs JMarks (PCC)Won 30
W#1 SinglesLUIS AYALA vs Jim Marks5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesVaughn Schmutz vs Benjamin Shamanis6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesPaul Fackler vs Brad VanHoy6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesPaul Fackler vs Pedro Pinassi1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesPete Eakin vs Shivam Desai6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesJordan Paterra vs Michael Szabo2-6, 2-6
2026-05-18vs TBixler (Queens)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesPete Eakin vs Bryan Stonestreet2-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesJordan Paterra vs Thomas Bixler1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesLUIS AYALA vs Chet Kristy4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Men - Mon PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TBixler (Queens)6218614158
2WTiedeman/KGreen (Park Road)6217718170
3LAyala (Hornets Nest)44141025186
4GDumit/ASchulz (Alexander Stree Park)35101430216
5JOlmstead (Mason Wallace)3561838255
6JMarks (PCC)1751939244

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.18 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Pete Eakin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
4.26
Jared McKiernan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.19
Paul Fackler
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
4.19
Vaughn Schmutz
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
4.10
Jordan Paterra
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.08
LUIS AYALA
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pete Eakin
22W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
4.29
Jared McKiernan
7W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
4.26
Paul Fackler
5W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
4.19
Vaughn Schmutz
8W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Jordan Paterra
64W–57L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
4.10
LUIS AYALA
5W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
4.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.