Teams

*11-ROakley-EV

2024 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Evening

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-29vs *5-TBarfield-CHCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesReggie Oakley / Tom Luben vs James Powell / Robert Hutchins0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesArash Chehrazi vs William Enright3-6, 3-6
2024-04-22vs *13-RGildehaus-YMCA-40Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLee Goldberg / Reggie Oakley vs Ricky Ayers / Christopher DeFusco3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-04-15vs *7-TPetersen-HRWon 20
W#1 SinglesArash Chehrazi vs Adam Lang6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRyan Boyles / Tom Luben vs Jerome Croan / Michael Klein6-4, 6-2
2024-04-01vs *4-VStiebris-HS-40 3.5Split 11
W#2 DoublesArash Chehrazi / Rick Edmunds vs Dave Thomas / Michael Holt6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesReggie Oakley / Tom Luben vs Dirk Kumashiro / David Evert2-6, 4-6
2024-03-18vs *2-JLockhead-HRLost 01
L#3 DoublesTom Luben / Reggie Oakley vs John Spurrell / Chris Roessler2-6, 0-6
2024-03-11vs *8 MHansen-HVCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesTom Luben / Ryan Boyles vs Richard Brown / Donald Bynum2-6, 4-6
2024-03-04vs *12-MCurry-SVCLost 02
L#2 DoublesReggie Oakley / Chris Reeves vs John Stephens / Leon Malahias2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesWill Johnson / Tom Luben vs Gustaf Bjorkman / David Hubacher1-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Schumann
published 4
3.34
JAMES MONTAGUE
published 3.5
3.32
Arash Chehrazi
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Chris Reeves
published 3.5
3.10
Bart Smith
published 3.5
2.96
Rick Edmunds
published 3
2.86
Tom Luben
usually #3 Doubles 69%, also #2 Doubles 15% · published 3
2.67
Ryan Boyles
published
2.66
Reggie Oakley
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3
Lee Goldberg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Reggie Oakley + Tom Luben3347% gamesnot enough data
Reggie Oakley + Chris Reeves224 matchesnot enough data
Rick Edmunds + Tom Luben224 matchesnot enough data
Rick Edmunds + Arash Chehrazi224 matchesnot enough data
Rick Edmunds + Chris Reeves213 matchesnot enough data
Chris Reeves + Ryan Boyles303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Schumann
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
JAMES MONTAGUE
29W–43L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Arash Chehrazi
87W–57L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Chris Reeves
21W–21L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Bart Smith
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
3.10
3
Rick Edmunds
77W–93L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Tom Luben
87W–115L career · 13 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
2.86
Ryan Boyles
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Reggie Oakley
56W–103L career · 11 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
2.66
Lee Goldberg
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.