Teams

Graham/Johnson-CORTA

2025 CORTA 55 & Over Mixed Doubles Regional Championships · 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.12 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-23vs Welty-CALHOUNLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrian Allen / Cheryl DeYoung vs Ann Carroll / Scott King1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRyan McCann / Sylvia Mckee vs Pam Mills / David Locke6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJay Curlee / Kay Gantt vs Parmesh Venkatesu / Karlene Welty3-6, 3-6
2025-03-23vs Shayne-CORTAWon 21
W#1 DoublesSylvia Mckee / Ryan McCann vs Ty Hutchinson / Vicki Carde7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAndrea Bingham / Jeffery McGarr vs Bruce Roberts / Andrea Walden4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDarlene Graham / Watson Mathis vs Donald Kean / Debra Kirksey6-2, 6-3
2025-03-22vs Welty-CALHOUNLost 03
L#1 DoublesThomas Hampton / Kay Gantt vs Heather Ellington / Ricky Wilson2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Hunter / Pat Kelley vs Ann Carroll / Scott King0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Allen / Cheryl DeYoung vs Pam Mills / David Locke3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-22vs Shayne-CORTAWon 21
L#1 DoublesJeffery McGarr / Andrea Bingham vs Bruce Roberts / Diana Newman2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJay Curlee / Kay Gantt vs Ty Hutchinson / Vicki Carde6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesWatson Mathis / Darlene Graham vs Carl Shayne / Debra Kirksey6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Welty-CALHOUN4093882
2Graham/Johnson-CORTA225714112
3Shayne-CORTA044817125

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Canita Johnson
published 3.5
2.99
Kay Gantt
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.93
Sylvia Mckee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Andrea Bingham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Darlene Graham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Pat Kelley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Cheryl DeYoung
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.60
Jeffery McGarr
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jay Curlee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Thomas Hampton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Watson Mathis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Canita Johnson
25W–37L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Kay Gantt
43W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Sylvia Mckee
25W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Andrea Bingham
39W–66L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Darlene Graham
29W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.85
Pat Kelley
22W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Cheryl DeYoung
18W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.72
Jeffery McGarr
6W–53L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60
Jay Curlee
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Hampton
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Watson Mathis
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.