Teams

Raintree Evans

2023 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Weekday Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.38 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-21vs Stonehenge BullWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Evans / Shannon Webb vs Linda Larue / Judy Napier6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-07-12vs MTC HilbertLost 02
L#1 DoublesLisa Harmon / Shannon Webb vs Elizabeth Diller / Olena Turner2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Morris / Michele Riedel vs Kati Shick / Lindsay Hardage2-6, 1-6
2023-07-07vs ACAC Cheatham / HoeferWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Morris / Michele Riedel vs Carol Hoefer / Trisha Smith3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-07-06vs HCC YablonskiLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Morris / Shannon Webb vs Betsy Kersey / AMY LINES2-6, 1-6
2023-07-05vs WOCC Moehling / StringerWon 10
W#1 SinglesShannon Webb vs Kelly Gregory6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2023-06-29vs HCC WalshSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJennifer Morris / Shannon Webb vs ANJA BAUGH / Teki Hall2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLydia Smith / Michele Riedel vs Traci Lantzy / Virginia Berents6-4, 6-1
2023-06-28vs TDC SpillareLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichele Riedel / Susan Evans vs Lauren Duke / Megan Lyness1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Wood / Shannon Webb vs Kim Spillare / Kaitlin Marschke6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2023-06-26vs Westwood Combs / PokrywkaWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Morris / Michele Riedel vs Kelly Berry / Holly Martin6-3, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Weekday Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Lisa Harmon
published
3.41
Michele Riedel
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.30
Lorraine McGehee
published
3.22
Bridget Westhoven
published 3.5
3.17
Karen Solana
published
3.09
Shannon Webb
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.02
Christine Martine
published 3.5
3.01
Donna Moody
published
Anne Sansom
published 3
Karen Wood
published
Kathryn Darling
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Harmon + Lorraine McGehee404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Harmon
16W–5L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
3.5
Michele Riedel
71W–114L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%74%25%
3.41
Lorraine McGehee
14W–15L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Bridget Westhoven
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Karen Solana
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Shannon Webb
112W–98L career · 6 lines in 2023
25%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Christine Martine
4W–10L career · type A · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.02
Donna Moody
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.01
3
Anne Sansom
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen Wood
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathryn Darling
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.