Teams

Farmington - Khodirev - Ladies 2.5

2026 Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-14vs Glenmore - JohnstonLost 02
L#1 DoublesJeanette Wang / Susan Brooks vs Andrea Wilder / Nerissa Rouzer4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Keevil / Mimi Scully vs Ellen Schaff / Pam Socolow1-6, 1-6
2026-06-07vs ACAC - Odom 2.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesJeanette Wang / Susan Brooks vs Apitchaya Miller / Ann Jones6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Keevil / Kristina Loftus vs Diane Espinosa / Charlotte Odom6-4, 6-2
2026-05-20vs BHSC - Cook DommerWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeanette Wang / Susan Brooks vs Janel Kasparson / Abigail Cook Dommer6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLauren Holzman vs Disha Venkatesan6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Keevil / Catharine Lentz vs Virginia Mcmillin / Ronda Ingersoll3-6, 0-2
2026-05-17vs BHSC - SwitzerSplit 11
W#1 SinglesLauren Holzman vs Esther Bobbin6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMimi Scully / Susan Brooks vs Amy Bouton / Kelly Owens1-6, 3-6
2026-05-13vs ACAC - Odom 2.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Keevil / Jeanette Wang vs Danielle Coccomo / Apitchaya Miller4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLauren Holzman vs Ann Hague6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMackie Gilchrist / Catharine Lentz vs Candice van der Linde / Wendi Cook2-6, 2-6
2026-05-03vs Glenmore - JohnstonLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeanette Wang / Mackie Gilchrist vs Andrea Wilder / Nerissa Rouzer0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLauren Holzman vs Katie Sions6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMimi Scully / Susan Brooks vs Pam Socolow / Julie Nash2-6, 3-6
2026-04-19vs BHSC - Cook DommerLost 03
L#1 DoublesClaire Frantz / Jeanette Wang vs Sara Green / Ellen McAllister5-2
L#1 SinglesKristina Loftus vs Claire Griffin2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMimi Scully / Susan Brooks vs Ronda Ingersoll / Chelsie Garriott1-6, 5-7
2026-04-12vs BHSC - SwitzerLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Brooks / Kristina Loftus vs Kathryn Harris / Katherine Mcnerney0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLauren Holzman vs Amy Bouton7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJennifer Keevil / Mimi Scully vs Esther Bobbin / Jessica Kinnick1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BHSC - Cook Dommer35111328221
2ACAC - Odom 2.535101432228
3Farmington - Khodirev - Ladies 2.52681633232

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.09 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.39
Lauren Holzman
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published
Catharine Lentz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Claire Frantz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.24
Jeanette Wang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 42% · published
2.06
Kristina Loftus
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
1.95
Jennifer Keevil
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
1.80
Mimi Scully
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mackie Gilchrist
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Holzman
10W–5L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.39
2.5
Catharine Lentz
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Claire Frantz
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Jeanette Wang
6W–12L career · 12 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Kristina Loftus
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Jennifer Keevil
1W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Mimi Scully
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.80
Mackie Gilchrist
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.