Teams

Estrada

2026 Anne Arundel Mixed Other Summer · Anne Arundel Mixed Other Summer 2.5

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-30vs BaylorSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBetsy Morris / Chris Jones vs Laurie Selby / Kirk Wilkerson1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAlexandra McKay / Jonathan Antoine vs Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne / Sean Helfrich6-3, 6-4
2026-08-23vs BaylorWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Chavez / Xavier Estrada vs Elmer Buddy Baylor / Lorayne Constant6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMary Mullennix / Chris Jones vs Tom Pinkiert / Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAlexandra McKay / Jonathan Antoine vs Theresa Coufal / Nick Julian6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-08-09vs BaylorLost 12
L#1 DoublesTracie Hamilton / Chris Jones vs Lorayne Constant / Tom Pinkiert4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Chavez / Xavier Estrada vs Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne / Sean Helfrich6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesRomina Averza / Kimon Kanelakis vs Tamara Thumbtzen / Elmer Buddy Baylor5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Anne Arundel Mixed Other Summer 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Baylor1021227
2Estrada0112432

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.31 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.62
Jennifer Chavez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.51
Xavier Estrada
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.40
Mary Mullennix
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.38
Romina Averza
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.31
Betsy Morris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Alexandra McKay
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.11
Irina Pletneva
published 2.5
1.87
Tracie Hamilton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kimon Kanelakis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Xavier Estrada + Romina Averza224 matchesnot enough data
Xavier Estrada + Mary Mullennix224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Chavez
31W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.62
2.5
Xavier Estrada
79W–102L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
0%48%52%
2.51
2.5
Mary Mullennix
40W–55L career · 1 line in 2026
0%77%23%
2.40
2.5
Romina Averza
30W–73L career · 1 line in 2026
0%82%18%
2.38
2.5
Betsy Morris
11W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
0%93%7%
2.31
2.5
Alexandra McKay
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Irina Pletneva
3W–11L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Tracie Hamilton
0W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.87
Kimon Kanelakis
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.