Teams

Bashi Bazouks

2022 Montgomery Combo Winter · Montgomery Combo Winter 7.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.64 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-04-02vs DefendersWon 10
W#2 DoublesMark Burgreen / Xavier Ona vs Jim Leveque / Richard McKeon6-0, 6-4
2022-03-18vs Well HongLost 01
L#2 DoublesPaul Brennan / Matt Baumann vs Mikhail Laryukhin / Carlos Heard4-6, 3-6
2022-03-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Brennan / Xavier Ona vs David Cheo / David Mount2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-02-24vs DefendersSplit 11
L#2 DoublesXavier Ona / Joshua Folk vs Michael Zehr / Jim Leveque6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesBrad Nes / Robert Baily vs Chris Miller / Sean Alewine6-3, 6-1
2022-02-12vs Well HongSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMark Burgreen / Xavier Ona vs Mikhail Laryukhin / Dmitri Blumin3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesZaf Basha / Matt Baumann vs Jagannath Surampudi / Brian Lynk6-4, 6-2
2022-02-08vs IvanWon 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Baily / Xavier Ona vs Igor Chechik / David Cheo6-1, 6-2
2022-02-02vs String TheoryWon 10
W#2 DoublesThomas MacNevin / Matt Baumann vs Bergin John / Ji Kim7-6, 6-4
2022-01-26vs DefendersLost 01
L#1 DoublesEric Berg / Matt Baumann vs Scott Miller / Jim Leveque3-6, 3-6
2022-01-11vs String TheoryLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristopher Garlock / Robert Baily vs Brian Bichy / Todd Wheeler6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Combo Winter 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Robert Baily
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Darren Felix
published 4
3.74
Joshua Folk
published
3.53
Paul Brennan
published
3.40
Xavier Ona
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.38
Matt Baumann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Christopher Bragale
published 3.5
3.21
Florin Iancu
published 3.5
3.00
Brad Nes
published 3.5
Zaf Basha
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Xavier Ona + Matt Baumann224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Robert Baily
90W–89L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Darren Felix
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joshua Folk
24W–25L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Paul Brennan
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Xavier Ona
132W–118L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Matt Baumann
225W–179L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Christopher Bragale
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Florin Iancu
30W–34L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Brad Nes
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.00
Zaf Basha
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.