Teams

MVC Tsutsumi Buckhold SSL A40-3.5W

2023 WMI SSL USTA League Adult 40&Over Weekday Leagues · WMI SSL A40&O 3.5 W (6 player)

13 players · average NTRP 3.58 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2023-05-17vs ML Ring SSL A40-3.5WWon 30
W#1 DoublesAndrea Collins / Michelle Madden vs Kathleen Stockall / Jamie Hartman Ring6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNatsuko Tsutsumi Buckhold / Beth Fuehrer vs Gretchen Karslake / Jodi Wujkowski6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCindy Vander Ploeg / Tinker Judson vs Laurie Fata / Patti Congleton6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WMI SSL A40&O 3.5 W (6 player) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
OPHIE FIX
published
Andrea Collins
published 4
3.56
Natsuko Tsutsumi Buckhold
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Beth Balon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Margaret Steketee
published
3.29
Patricia Hunnewell
published
Cindy Vander Ploeg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Michelle Madden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Beth Fuehrer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Amy Sjolin
published 3.5
3.06
Tinker Judson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Heather Garbaty
published 3.5
Susan Weiss
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natsuko Tsutsumi Buckhold + Tinker Judson7163% games+9.1% vs expected
Cindy Vander Ploeg + Natsuko Tsutsumi Buckhold6262% games+5.9% vs expected
Amy Sjolin + Beth Balon10755% games+5.8% vs expected
Natsuko Tsutsumi Buckhold + Beth Balon17563% games+5.5% vs expected
Beth Fuehrer + Amy Sjolin10359% games+4.2% vs expected
Patricia Hunnewell + Beth Fuehrer7357% games+3.4% vs expected
Michelle Madden + Beth Balon192252% games+3.0% vs expected
Amy Sjolin + Cindy Vander Ploeg8458% games+2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

OPHIE FIX
82W–39L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Andrea Collins
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Natsuko Tsutsumi Buckhold
133W–57L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
Beth Balon
106W–87L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
Margaret Steketee
114W–63L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
Patricia Hunnewell
59W–37L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Cindy Vander Ploeg
66W–59L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Michelle Madden
114W–96L career · 1 line in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Beth Fuehrer
43W–33L career · 1 line in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Amy Sjolin
86W–82L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
Tinker Judson
42W–31L career · 1 line in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.06
3.5
Heather Garbaty
50W–71L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.02
Susan Weiss
5W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.