Teams

SYTC:Holden:Holden

2022 Cape Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed Flt 1

10 players · average NTRP 3.42 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-09vs Willy's:Herons:BernsteinLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnne Castine / David Holden vs James Ballway / Bess Brodsky6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSherry Crockett / Charlie Annaloro vs Janet Sweeney / Doug Grover0-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKathy Glannon / Rick Coffey vs Andrew Cordonnier / Barbara Lemperly Grant3-6, 5-7
2022-07-26vs Willy's:Herons:BernsteinLost 02
L#1 DoublesTina Mosca / David Holden vs David Bernstein / Janet Sweeney0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSherry Crockett / Charlie Annaloro vs Ellen Sicinski / William Holcombe1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-07-19vs Sesuit:Leveille:LeveilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Holden / Kathy Glannon vs Christine Cook / James Veninger1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSherry Crockett / James Zahareas vs Desiree Mobed / Irving Epstein6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesHenry Pescatore / Jacqueline Pescatore vs Laura Leveille / Michael Leveille6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-07-12vs Willy's:Herons:BernsteinLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Holden / Kathy Glannon vs Ellen Sicinski / Doug Grover5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCharlie Annaloro / Annemarie Allen vs Henry Brehm / Catherine Haynes1-6, 3-6
2022-07-05vs Sesuit:Kenny;Kenny/NapoliLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathy Glannon / David Holden vs Jeanne Bissonnette / Paul Napoli1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Castine / Rick Coffey vs Sarah Toadvine / Chris Blackburn3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Pescatore / Henry Pescatore vs Angela Rutzick / Charles Deltatto6-2, 6-1
2022-06-28vs Sesuit:Leveille:LeveilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathy Glannon / Rick Coffey vs James Veninger / Christine Cook3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSherry Crockett / Charlie Annaloro vs Gerald Haigh / Lauren Labelle7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJacqueline Pescatore / Henry Pescatore vs Irving Epstein / Abbe Seldin2-6, 0-6
2022-06-21vs Sesuit:Kenny;Kenny/NapoliLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathy Glannon / David Holden vs Paul Napoli / Jeanne Bissonnette6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnnemarie Allen / Rick Coffey vs Ken Pedicini / Kelly ORourke1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesSherry Crockett / James Zahareas vs Deanna Waldron / Charles Deltatto6-2, 6-1
2022-06-07vs Sesuit:Leveille:LeveilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid Holden / Anne Castine vs Irving Epstein / Desiree Mobed6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTina Mosca / Charlie Annaloro vs James Veninger / Christine Cook1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAnnemarie Allen / James Zahareas vs Michael Leveille / Nancy Whitehurst6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.0 Mixed Flt 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Willy's:Herons:Bernstein7219823201
2Sesuit:Leveille:Leveille63151224215
3Sesuit:Kenny;Kenny/Napoli35111329227
4SYTC:Holden:Holden1761837249

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Sherry Crockett
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.44
Anne Castine
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
David Holden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Henry Pescatore
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
James Zahareas
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Annemarie Allen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jacqueline Pescatore
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kathy Glannon
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Rick Coffey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Tina Mosca
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Holden + Kathy Glannon2934% gamesnot enough data
Rick Coffey + Kathy Glannon0832% gamesnot enough data
Henry Pescatore + Jacqueline Pescatore224 matchesnot enough data
James Zahareas + Annemarie Allen123 matchesnot enough data
James Zahareas + Anne Castine123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sherry Crockett
48W–59L career · 5 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Anne Castine
97W–92L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
David Holden
8W–26L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Henry Pescatore
6W–10L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
James Zahareas
11W–25L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Annemarie Allen
8W–25L career · 3 lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
2.96
3
Jacqueline Pescatore
2W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathy Glannon
3W–24L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rick Coffey
0W–19L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tina Mosca
8W–25L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.