Teams

9 Burkwood Clark

2022 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-30vs 1 Westwood HarkerWon 10
W#1 DoublesModestine Carter / Karen Matthews vs Patricia Bishop / Sheryl Highfill6-2, 6-3
2022-07-17vs 11 MRTC Battery Park HawleyWon 10
W#1 DoublesDonna Mourtzakis / Modestine Carter vs Carolyn Hawley / Tina Carter6-1, 6-2
2022-07-16vs 2 Wyndham CarlyleWon 10
W#3 DoublesVirginia Bowie / Teresa Landes-Shuler vs Sharon Moorefield / Ann Michele Sweeney6-3, 6-1
2022-07-09vs 3 ACAC Kellner/KrebsLost 02
L#1 DoublesModestine Carter / Donna Mourtzakis vs Theresa Bartholomew / Mary Knick3-6, 3-4
L#2 DoublesVirginia Bowie / Deborah Clark vs Patti Bryan / Faith Kallman1-6, 2-6
2022-07-02vs 4 Woodlake PoindexterSplit 11
L#1 DoublesModestine Carter / Donna Mourtzakis vs Ana Adkins / Mary Estes3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesVirginia Bowie / Carolyn Shute vs Denise Giaccone / Jennifer Harris6-4, 6-3
2022-06-25vs 13 Willow Oaks Moehling / StringerLost 01
L#1 DoublesModestine Carter / Virginia Bowie vs Darlene Moehling / Elizabeth Boyle5-7, 6-7
2022-06-18vs 10 RCC KochWon 10
W#1 DoublesModestine Carter / Donna Mourtzakis vs Laureen Mertz / Christine Martine6-4, 6-0
2022-06-11vs 8 Tornabene SCC Sal’s BerriesWon 10
W#1 DoublesDonna Mourtzakis / Modestine Carter vs Julie Kearfott / Stacey Piotrowski6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Modestine Carter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.22
Virginia Bowie
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Donna Mourtzakis
published 3.5
3.04
Kimberly Garrett
published
2.98
2.70
Carolyn Shute
published 3
Susan Pennino
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Virginia Bowie + Modestine Carter311159% games−0.5% vs expected
Donna Mourtzakis + Virginia Bowie213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Modestine Carter
219W–132L career · 7 lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Virginia Bowie
100W–71L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Donna Mourtzakis
14W–15L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.07
Kimberly Garrett
14W–17L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.04
Teresa Landes-Shuler
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
2.98
3
Carolyn Shute
10W–13L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Susan Pennino
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.