Teams

RC RAVNAAS

2025 FW USTA Adult Fall Ladies N · A

15 players · average NTRP 3.62 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for A have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Anna Patterson
published 4
3.35
Mallory Lummis
published
3.31
Lindsey Baird
published
3.29
Sadie Upham
published
3.23
Casey Lebus
published 3.5
3.21
Allison Nixon
published 3.5
3.20
Keelie Montague
published
3.19
Margo Bush
published
3.18
Ally Ravnaas
published 3.5
3.05
MacOn McColm
published
3.04
Michelle Kyle
published
2.81
Meagan Nayfa
published
2.66
Katie Howard
published
Meg Lebus
published
Molly van Amburgh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keelie Montague + Ally Ravnaas224 matchesnot enough data
Mallory Lummis + Casey Lebus224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anna Patterson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
Mallory Lummis
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
Lindsey Baird
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Sadie Upham
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Casey Lebus
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Allison Nixon
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
Keelie Montague
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Margo Bush
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Ally Ravnaas
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
MacOn McColm
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Michelle Kyle
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.04
Meagan Nayfa
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Katie Howard
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.66
Meg Lebus
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Molly van Amburgh
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.