Teams

Austin Tennis Players

Fall Adult 18 & Over Tri-Level · Men 5.0, 4.5, 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.67 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-10-13vs The Tennis TribeWon 21
W#1 DoublesEric White / Xavier Rodriguez vs Travis Lenz / Connor Sims6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAvery Gilbert / Michael Pan vs Subu Jayaram / Juan Dekruyff0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesPrashant Sharma / Suhail Ubaidur vs David Ballard / Pushkar Chhajed6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-10-12vs The Tennis TribeLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrew Portnoy / Eric White vs Hoanh Le / Luis Abundis1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSam Page / Chase Golden vs Juan Dekruyff / Subu Jayaram4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesLening Wang / Suhail Ubaidur vs Pushkar Chhajed / Kapil Rajurkar6-3, 6-3
2024-10-12vs The Tennis TribeWon 21
L#1 DoublesEric White / Andrew Portnoy vs Hoanh Le / Travis Lenz1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesGavin Parrish / Chase Golden vs Cody Everett / Justin Mart6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLening Wang / Prashant Sharma vs Quinn Davis / David Ballard6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 5.0, 4.5, 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.58
Avery Gilbert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.51
Gavin Parrish
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.51
Xavier Rodriguez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.47
Andrew Portnoy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.40
Chase Golden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Michael Pan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
Prashant Sharma
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.86
Suhail Ubaidur
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Lening Wang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sam Page
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gavin Parrish + Chase Golden6069% gamesnot enough data
Sam Page + Michael Pan303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Avery Gilbert
41W–22L career · 1 line in 2024
no projection at this level
4.58
Gavin Parrish
25W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%46%54%
4.51
Xavier Rodriguez
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
no projection at this level
4.51
4.5
Andrew Portnoy
20W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
4.47
4.5
Chase Golden
32W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
4.40
Michael Pan
29W–29L career · 1 line in 2024
6%92%2%
4.22
Prashant Sharma
38W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.87
Suhail Ubaidur
35W–31L career · 2 lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
3.86
Lening Wang
80W–38L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.82
Sam Page
26W–20L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.