Teams

Escambia - RS/Haack

2022 Escambia Mixed 40 & Over · 9.0 Mixed 40 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 4.60 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-03vs Wise - PCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLubomir Kaderjak / Jami Steinmetz vs William Mitchem / Carel Demanss2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKarlo Rivera / Renee Bradford vs Jeff Crigler / Shaner Garner Crooke6-1, 6-3
2022-02-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesWilliam Morris / Claudia Simmons vs William Mitchem / Carel Demanss4-6, 0-6
2022-02-16vs Wise - PCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLubomir Kaderjak / Jami Steinmetz vs Bob Olliff / Carel Demanss6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDaniel Herman / Claudia Simmons vs Jeff Crigler / Michelle Covell1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-02-13vs Wise - PCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLubomir Kaderjak / Claudia Simmons vs Rick Cuny / Carel Demanss4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKarlo Rivera / Renee Bradford vs Bob Olliff / Michelle Covell5-7, 1-6
2022-01-28vs Wise - PCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesWilliam Morris / Claudia Simmons vs William Mitchem / Michelle Covell6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDaniel Herman / Renee Bradford vs Cosme Barrios / Lisa Bew6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesLubomir Kaderjak / Lauren Haack vs Jeff Crigler / Shaner Garner Crooke6-1, 6-4
2022-01-26vs Wise - PCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLubomir Kaderjak / Claudia Simmons vs William Mitchem / Debbie Wroten6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDaniel Herman / Renee Bradford vs Bob Olliff / Michelle Covell0-6, 3-6
2022-01-26vs Wise - PCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesLubomir Kaderjak / Claudia Simmons vs Rick Cuny / Carel Demanss7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Claudia Simmons
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 5
4.36
Lubomir Kaderjak
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.30
Jami Steinmetz
published 4.5
4.17
Brad Bradford
published 4.5
4.17
Lauren Haack
published
4.11
Paul Einhart
published
3.78
Renee Bradford
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.76
Daniel Herman
published 4.5
William Morris
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Claudia Simmons
159W–94L career · 11 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Lubomir Kaderjak
183W–34L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
4.36
4.5
Jami Steinmetz
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Brad Bradford
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
4.17
Lauren Haack
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
4.17
Paul Einhart
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
4.11
Renee Bradford
134W–163L career · 8 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4.5
Daniel Herman
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
97%3%<1%
3.76
William Morris
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.