Teams

300/Wimsett-Dickerson

2026 Alachua Trilevel 18 & Over · Alachua Trilevel 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_2

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Alachua Trilevel 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Julie Sager
published 4
3.86
3.75
Anita Rajasekhar
published 4
3.56
Tiffany Scalf
published
3.34
Christa Arnold
published 3.5
3.28
Mary Mccue
published
3.25
Carla Intal
published 3.5
3.10
Ashley Chalouhi
published 3
3.08
Iryna Zasimovich
published 3
2.88
Cindi Harvey
published 3
2.73
MARY K WIMSETT
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Dickerson + Julie Sager12261% games+6.5% vs expected
Anita Rajasekhar + Julie Sager7161% games+3.2% vs expected
Elizabeth Dickerson + Anita Rajasekhar224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Julie Sager
182W–66L career · no lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
4.09
4
Elizabeth Dickerson
264W–115L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Anita Rajasekhar
130W–74L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Tiffany Scalf
8W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.56
3.5
Christa Arnold
271W–143L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Mary Mccue
5W–1L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Carla Intal
112W–52L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3
Ashley Chalouhi
30W–22L career · no lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.10
3
Iryna Zasimovich
51W–22L career · no lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.08
3
Cindi Harvey
3W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Danielle Jake-schoffman
13W–6L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
MARY K WIMSETT
82W–74L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.