Teams

Team Chantilly 2.5

2023 NOVA Adult 18 & Over · NOVA Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-04vs Sassy SmashersLost 02
L#1 DoublesKimberly McPhee / Dawn Werner vs Elisa Wolf / Patricia Hathaway0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Dinga / Ingrid Hunsicker vs Christy Bixler / Kim Hovda0-6, 1-6
2023-05-19vs Sassy SmashersWon 20
W#1 DoublesChandra Bittner / Kimberly McPhee vs Claudelle Gehy / Janet Rogers6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesSandy Lucidi vs Sandra Kim6-7, 2-0
2023-05-17vs Team RJT W2.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesChandra Bittner / Sandy Lucidi vs Caitlin Jones / Natalia Urban6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesIngrid Hunsicker vs Boriana Chopova7-6, 0-5
2023-05-11vs RJ Net AssetsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesIngrid Hunsicker / Kimberly McPhee vs Lena Ferris / Jennifer Kroll6-7, 3-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSandy Lucidi vs Joyce Aramburu6-2, 6-3
2023-05-02vs Net JobsWon 20
W#1 DoublesChandra Bittner / Linda Dinga vs Barbara Haber / Anu Shah6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSandy Lucidi vs Rosy Mcgillan6-0, 6-2
2023-04-16vs Team RJT W2.5Lost 01
L#1 SinglesIngrid Hunsicker vs Nicole Dougherty3-6, 0-6
2023-04-08vs RJ Net AssetsLost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberly McPhee / Lynette Bickley vs Joyce Aramburu / Amy Din6-7, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Chandra Bittner
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.90
Kimberly McPhee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Ingrid Hunsicker
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.85
Fiona Campbell
published 3
2.75
Sandy Lucidi
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.73
Susan Campbell
published
2.59
Linda Dinga
published
2.30
Deanna Breda
published 2.5
1.93
Nancy F Schmidt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ingrid Hunsicker + Kimberly McPhee224 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly McPhee + Sandy Lucidi123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chandra Bittner
112W–61L career · 7 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Kimberly McPhee
53W–28L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Ingrid Hunsicker
113W–175L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Fiona Campbell
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Sandy Lucidi
38W–24L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
2.75
Susan Campbell
17W–20L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Linda Dinga
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.59
2.5
Deanna Breda
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
0%94%6%
2.30
Nancy F Schmidt
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.93
Kerilyn McMichael-Beltran
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.