Teams

Sh.Agresta18A

2024 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-04-23vs Yu.Barthes18AWon 10
W#2 DoublesSharon Agresta / Jennifer Holloman vs Jennifer Wolborsky / Ngoc Tran6-2, 6-3
2024-04-16vs Ki.Monsees18ALost 02
L#1 DoublesKimberly Walker / Jennifer Holloman vs Jeanie White / Meghan Yancey5-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesStephanie Suski vs Kimberly Durland0-6, 3-6
2024-04-02vs Mi.Ladd18ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesJane Hunter / Jennifer Holloman vs Karen Hagens / Mindy Ladd7-5, 6-4
L#2 SinglesStephanie Suski vs Jeanette Gerould4-6, 5-7
2024-03-19vs Na.Regan18ALost 01
L#3 DoublesSharon Agresta / Shelia Knoll vs Susan Hembarsky / Gretchen Swank3-6, 3-6
2024-03-12vs El.Merritt18AWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Holloman / Robin Sealey vs Harriet Mills / Julie Coyne4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-03-05vs Ta.Kozacko18ALost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Holloman / Shannon Phillips vs Meike Schacht / Kim Johnson6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Lorraine Hall
published
3.71
Jane Hunter
published
3.57
Jennifer Holloman
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.36
Robin Sealey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Noelle Schofield
published
2.99
Stephanie Suski
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #2 Singles 38% · published 3
2.99
Sharon Agresta
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robin Sealey + Jennifer Holloman101149% games−3.8% vs expected
Sharon Agresta + Jennifer Holloman6546% gamesnot enough data
Robin Sealey + Jane Hunter123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lorraine Hall
53W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.72
Jane Hunter
18W–12L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Jennifer Holloman
194W–92L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
<1%28%72%
3.57
3.5
Robin Sealey
64W–63L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.36
Noelle Schofield
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.11
3
Stephanie Suski
125W–101L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
2.99
3.5
Sharon Agresta
39W–51L career · 2 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
2.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.