Teams

BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 18AM3.5A

2023 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 3.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2023-05-16vs GLTF/GOLDMAN TC 18AM3.5ALost 01
L#3 DoublesJonas Edman / Daniel Lim vs Howard Miller / Tim Miller2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Matt Dveirin
published
3.52
Patrick Haley
published
3.43
Russ Iwanchuk
published
3.41
Ryan Morrison
published
3.40
Matthew Kahn
published
3.37
Morgan Jones
published
3.36
Craig Quan
published 3.5
3.35
Daniel Lim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Simon Arnold
published
3.32
Satish Gudiboina
published
3.31
Nathan Macheel
published 3.5
3.29
Eric Debbane
published 3.5
Eric Isaacs
published 3.5
3.19
Tyrone Miller
published
3.10
Timothy Tuttle
published
3.05
Jean-Marc Sallenave
published
2.91
Paul Swink
published
2.87
Christopher Castle
published 3.5
Leonard Chang
published
Matthew Cooney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matt Dveirin + Russ Iwanchuk134 matchesnot enough data
Simon Arnold + Ryan Morrison404 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Kahn + Satish Gudiboina314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matt Dveirin
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%28%72%
3.58
Patrick Haley
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.52
Russ Iwanchuk
17W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
Ryan Morrison
15W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.41
Matthew Kahn
14W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.40
Morgan Jones
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Craig Quan
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Daniel Lim
33W–31L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.35
Simon Arnold
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.34
Satish Gudiboina
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Nathan Macheel
20W–16L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Eric Debbane
7W–22L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Eric Isaacs
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tyrone Miller
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Timothy Tuttle
7W–12L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Jean-Marc Sallenave
4W–12L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.05
Paul Swink
5W–12L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
2.91
3.5
Christopher Castle
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
2.87
Leonard Chang
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Matthew Cooney
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.