Teams

Oakwood 8.0

2023 Lynchburg Mixed 18 & Over · Lynchburg Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-03-18vs Hall of FramersWon 10
W#2 DoublesStuart Tinsley / Dawn Fraser vs Janika Carey / Timothy Shank6-4, 6-2
2023-03-04vs Hall of FramersWon 10
W#3 DoublesStuart Tinsley / Dawn Fraser vs Charlie Durie / Amanda Rhem6-3, 6-2
2023-02-25vs String BustersWon 10
W#2 DoublesCharlie Larson / Dawn Fraser vs Michael Hoover / Margaret Blount6-0, 6-0
2023-01-28vs BCC 8.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesStuart Tinsley / Dawn Fraser vs Edward Armfield / Becky Giles6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Lynchburg Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bob Bailey
published 4.5
3.96
Dawn Fraser
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.90
Grace Petty
published
3.88
Stuart Kettinger
published
3.73
Keith Higar
published
3.72
Eliana Marcilio
published
3.66
Kersten Morrison
published
3.63
Maria Roberts
published
3.60
Fran Inge
published
3.54
Elizabeth Kettinger
published
3.52
Charlie Larson
published 4
3.50
Jessica Hughes
published
3.50
Susan Larson
published
3.44
Amy Scott
published 3.5
Scott Englund
published
Stuart Tinsley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Larson + Charlie Larson1449% gamesnot enough data
Scott Englund + Elizabeth Kettinger303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Bob Bailey
2W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Dawn Fraser
115W–70L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.96
Grace Petty
15W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.90
Stuart Kettinger
11W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.88
Keith Higar
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Eliana Marcilio
8W–1L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.72
Kersten Morrison
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
Maria Roberts
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.63
Fran Inge
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
Elizabeth Kettinger
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Charlie Larson
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.52
Jessica Hughes
13W–2L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.50
Susan Larson
13W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Amy Scott
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
Scott Englund
15W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stuart Tinsley
28W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.