Teams

Bean

2026 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER INVITATIONAL · 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Alice Dant
published 3.5
3.35
Kathy Schoen
published
3.26
Paula Adkins
published
3.22
Billie Welker
published 3.5
3.20
Elizabeth Ohlmann
published 3.5
3.19
Kim Greenrose
published
3.15
Janie Bean
published
3.12
Denise Puthuff
published 3.5
3.11
Vicki Rogers
published
2.98
Stephanie Young
published
2.94
Carol Warren
published 3.5
Susan Habeeb
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Habeeb + Carol Warren033 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Young + Janie Bean123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alice Dant
9W–17L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
Kathy Schoen
13W–19L career · no lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
Paula Adkins
31W–36L career · no lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Billie Welker
22W–12L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Elizabeth Ohlmann
50W–47L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Kim Greenrose
66W–71L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
Janie Bean
35W–42L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Denise Puthuff
21W–46L career · no lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.12
Vicki Rogers
4W–13L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
Stephanie Young
123W–79L career · no lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.98
3.5
Carol Warren
7W–15L career · no lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.94
Susan Habeeb
6W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.