Teams

UPTA70A/Cooper/Brookstone

2025 UPTA Adult 70 & Over - SC · 70 Adult Men - 3.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-16vs UPTA70A/Graham/KrocWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarc Michalovsky / Mark Peterman vs Michael Burks / RA Hetherington6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRandel Cooper / John Lesley vs Philip Bynum / Andrew McKinney6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Barrett / Dick Kilpatrick vs Bill Graham / John McCrary6-2, 6-3
2025-04-09vs UPTA70A/Dobson/RiversideLost 12
L#1 DoublesMark Peterman / Mikell Perry vs Charles Mullen / Henere P Valk6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Barrett / Dick Kilpatrick vs John Groves / Geary Angermeier4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDonald Kesling / John Lesley vs Bob Hanis / David Dobson1-6, 2-6
2025-03-26vs UPTA70A/Graham/KrocWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Barrett / Dick Kilpatrick vs Michael Burks / Philip Bynum6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRandel Cooper / John Lesley vs Bill Graham / Andrew McKinney6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMarc Michalovsky / Mark Peterman vs John McCrary / RA Hetherington6-2, 6-1
2025-03-19vs UPTA70A/Dobson/RiversideLost 12
L#1 DoublesTerry Orr / Donald Kesling vs David Dobson / Henere P Valk6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRandel Cooper / Mark Peterman vs Bob Hanis / John Groves6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDavid Barrett / Dick Kilpatrick vs Paul Kooistra / Rayford McNair6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 70 Adult Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Dick Kilpatrick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Mark Peterman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.28
Randel Cooper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Mikell Perry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Donald Kesling
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
John Lesley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Marc Michalovsky
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Peterman + Randel Cooper2547% games−5.3% vs expected
Randel Cooper + John Lesley224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dick Kilpatrick
24W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Mark Peterman
19W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.28
Randel Cooper
38W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
Mikell Perry
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Donald Kesling
4W–9L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
John Lesley
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.16
Marc Michalovsky
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.