Teams

Selby

2026 Anne Arundel Doubles Winter Women · Anne Arundel Doubles Winter 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.70 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-04-01vs KoeppWon 21
W#1 DoublesSherreen Ogletree / Sarah Worcester vs Michelle O'Brien / Kim Piasecki6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSandra Ingley / Laurie Selby vs Liz Macdonald / Mary Mullennix7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGiovanna Schummer / Kelly Vinopal vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-03-18vs KoeppWon 21
W#1 DoublesGiovanna Schummer / Sarah Worcester vs Mala Filippell / Michelle O'Brien3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLara Henneman / Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne vs Susan Koepp / Sarah Coster4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Hastings / Sherreen Ogletree vs Anne Callahan / Irina Pletneva6-2, 6-3
2026-03-10vs KoeppLost 12
L#1 DoublesVictoria Ehly / Sarah Worcester vs Michelle O'Brien / Kim Piasecki4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLara Henneman / Laurie Selby vs Liz Macdonald / Priti Bhansali6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSandra Ingley / Kay Kalber vs Anne Callahan / Sarah Coster6-2, 6-3
2026-03-04vs KoeppLost 03
L#1 DoublesGiovanna Schummer / Victoria Ehly vs Priti Bhansali / Mala Filippell4-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLadonna Griffith-Lesesne / Kathy Hastings vs Susan Koepp / Sandra Julian4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKay Kalber / Sandra Ingley vs Sarah Coster / Irina Pletneva6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-02-26vs KoeppWon 21
W#1 DoublesVictoria Ehly / Giovanna Schummer vs Kim Piasecki / Priti Bhansali6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLara Henneman / Sarah Worcester vs Michelle O'Brien / Irina Pletneva6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesLadonna Griffith-Lesesne / Sandra Ingley vs Mary Mullennix / Susan Koepp3-6, 7-5
2026-02-18vs KoeppLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Worcester / Kathy Hastings vs Mala Filippell / Liz Macdonald4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSandra Ingley / Laurie Selby vs Susan Koepp / Sandra Julian6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLara Henneman / Kay Kalber vs Sarah Coster / Irina Pletneva2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-02-10vs KoeppLost 12
L#1 DoublesVictoria Ehly / Laurie Selby vs Priti Bhansali / Mala Filippell6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLadonna Griffith-Lesesne / Sarah Worcester vs Liz Macdonald / Sandra Julian1-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesSherreen Ogletree / Kelly Vinopal vs Mary Mullennix / Susan Koepp2-6, 2-6
2026-02-04vs KoeppWon 30
W#1 DoublesJanella Astrero / Laurie Selby vs Michelle O'Brien / Liz Macdonald3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathy Hastings / Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne vs Mary Mullennix / Sarah Coster6-4, 6-5
W#3 DoublesSarah Worcester / Kay Kalber vs Anne Callahan / Irina Pletneva6-2, 7-5
2026-01-14vs KoeppLost 12
L#1 DoublesGiovanna Schummer / Lara Henneman vs Priti Bhansali / Liz Macdonald2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Hastings / Laurie Selby vs Sandra Julian / Kim Piasecki6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJanella Astrero / Kelly Vinopal vs Mary Mullennix / Irina Pletneva4-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Anne Arundel Doubles Winter 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Koepp54151233258
2Selby45121533249

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Victoria Ehly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Giovanna Schummer
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.76
Janella Astrero
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.68
Sarah Worcester
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.67
Kathy Hastings
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.52
Laurie Selby
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.41
Kay Kalber
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Sherreen Ogletree
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.38
Heather Hollenbach
published 2.5
2.37
Sandra Ingley
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.32
Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.31
Kelly Vinopal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.30
Lara Henneman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Victoria Ehly + Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne213 matchesnot enough data
Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne + Lara Henneman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Victoria Ehly
32W–46L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
2.86
3
Giovanna Schummer
48W–46L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
Janella Astrero
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
Sarah Worcester
5W–2L career · 7 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
Kathy Hastings
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
Laurie Selby
12W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%44%56%
2.52
Kay Kalber
5W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%76%24%
2.41
Sherreen Ogletree
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.40
2.5
Heather Hollenbach
6W–1L career · no lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.38
Sandra Ingley
3W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.37
2.5
Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne
39W–85L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.32
Kelly Vinopal
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.31
2.5
Lara Henneman
21W–51L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.