Teams

Hawaii/Carstenn/18&Over5.0M

2025 Adult 18 and Over League · 5.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-26vs Free AgentsWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Kennedy / Zach Heilbron vs Cliff Nguyen / Michael Sasser4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMickael Faucher vs Jeffrey Grimmer6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlec Wagner / Gus Zimmer vs Tim Kelley / Christopher Parish6-3, 7-5
2025-05-11vs Free AgentsWon 21
L#1 DoublesJared Carstenn / Alec Wagner vs Cliff Nguyen / Michael Sasser6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMickael Faucher vs Jeffrey Grimmer6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJohn Kennedy / Zach Heilbron vs Christopher Parish / Payton Nagasawa6-4, 6-3
2025-05-08vs Free AgentsLost 12
L#1 DoublesGus Zimmer / John Kennedy vs Carlo-Marco Argones / Payton Nagasawa3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJared Carstenn vs Marcus Pearman4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAlec Wagner / Zach Heilbron vs Todd Hall / Tim Kelley6-3, 6-4
2025-05-08vs Free AgentsWon 21
W#1 DoublesJared Carstenn / John Kennedy vs Carlo-Marco Argones / Payton Nagasawa6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesGus Zimmer vs Michael Sasser3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAlec Wagner / Mickael Faucher vs Todd Hall / Tim Kelley6-4, 6-4
2025-04-19vs Free AgentsWon 20
W#1 DoublesMickael Faucher / John Kennedy vs Henry Somerville / Michael Sasser7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesZach Heilbron / Gus Zimmer vs Todd Hall / Tim Kelley6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 5.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hawaii/Carstenn/18&Over5.0M411149115

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.65 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.83
Jared Carstenn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.48
Gus Zimmer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
John Kennedy
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Mickael Faucher
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Zach Heilbron
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zach Heilbron + John Kennedy6070% gamesnot enough data
Gus Zimmer + Jared Carstenn213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jared Carstenn
41W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.83
Gus Zimmer
19W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.48
John Kennedy
9W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mickael Faucher
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Zach Heilbron
9W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.