Teams

WestonHills/Cardenas

2025 Broward Adult 40 & Over Day · 4.5 Adult Women

16 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-05vs Browardi/Ricky/40&Over4.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesNatalia Moll / Gretchyn Wagner vs Janine Burke / Sharon Runk6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMariel Cordero / Ivy Touchstone vs Laura Graff / Cheryl Hicks1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGloria Coursey / Susan Deeb vs Jill Rickey / Giselle Asplundh3-6, 1-6
2025-03-15vs Browardi/Ricky/40&Over4.5WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNatalia Moll / Gretchyn Wagner vs Sharon Runk / Giselle Asplundh3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMariel Cordero / Gabriela Castanon vs Jill Rickey / Sally Guerra6-4, 6-1
2025-02-22vs Browardi/Ricky/40&Over4.5WSplit 22
L#1 DoublesGabriela Castanon / Naisha Joseph vs Sharon Runk / Giselle Asplundh0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesIvet Hernandez vs Alaina Fotiu-Wojtowicz6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSilvia Cortes / RENEE ALEXIS vs Janine Burke / Sarah Austin2-6, 5-7
W#4 DoublesMariel Cordero / Gretchyn Wagner vs Sheri Adler / Caroline Verhelle1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-02-15vs Browardi/Ricky/40&Over4.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesGretchyn Wagner / Ivy Touchstone vs Janine Burke / Giselle Asplundh3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesPatricia Velez / Romina Paludi vs Alaina Fotiu-Wojtowicz / Sally Guerra7-5, 6-4
L#4 DoublesMariel Cordero / Gabriela Castanon vs Jill Rickey / Michelle Castellanos6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-02-08vs Browardi/Ricky/40&Over4.5WLost 13
L#1 DoublesSilvia Cortes / RENEE ALEXIS vs Sharon Runk / Giselle Asplundh2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNaisha Joseph / Gretchyn Wagner vs Janine Burke / Cheryl Hicks3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNatalia Moll / Gabriela Castanon vs Jill Rickey / Krista Geoffrion3-6, 2-6
W#4 DoublesPatricia Velez / Romina Paludi vs Lillie Hileman / Michelle Castellanos6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-01-18vs Browardi/Ricky/40&Over4.5WWon 31
W#1 DoublesPatricia Velez / Naisha Joseph vs Sheri Adler / Caroline Verhelle4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesIvet Hernandez vs Laura Graff6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGabriela Castanon / Diana C Cardenas vs Alaina Fotiu-Wojtowicz / Janine Burke2-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesLaura Herskowitz / Amanda Brahim vs Jill Rickey / Sally Guerra3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.28 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Diana C Cardenas
published 4.5
4.39
Gretchyn Wagner
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.39
Laura Herskowitz
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.38
Romina Paludi
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.38
Ivet Hernandez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.37
Natalia Moll
published
4.33
Naisha Joseph
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.31
Amanda Brahim
published 4.5
4.29
Laura di Lauro
published 4.5
4.29
Mariel Cordero
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.28
Silvia Cortes
published
4.25
Gabriela Castanon
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.22
Patricia Velez
published 4.5
4.20
RENEE ALEXIS
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.03
Gloria Coursey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.03
Ivy Touchstone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Velez + Romina Paludi10268% games+8.1% vs expected
Gloria Coursey + Ivy Touchstone7554% games+2.6% vs expected
Gloria Coursey + RENEE ALEXIS5157% gamesnot enough data
Gloria Coursey + Patricia Velez3259% gamesnot enough data
Natalia Moll + Laura di Lauro314 matchesnot enough data
Laura di Lauro + Romina Paludi314 matchesnot enough data
Silvia Cortes + Patricia Velez123 matchesnot enough data
Gabriela Castanon + Laura Herskowitz303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Diana C Cardenas
17W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Gretchyn Wagner
57W–43L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
4.39
4.5
Laura Herskowitz
170W–52L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
4.39
4.5
Romina Paludi
46W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
4.38
Ivet Hernandez
141W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
4.38
Natalia Moll
29W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
4.37
4.5
Naisha Joseph
86W–55L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
4.33
4.5
Amanda Brahim
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Laura di Lauro
93W–34L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.29
4.5
Mariel Cordero
97W–93L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.29
Silvia Cortes
17W–14L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Gabriela Castanon
255W–104L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Patricia Velez
93W–36L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
RENEE ALEXIS
92W–123L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
4.20
Gloria Coursey
103W–52L career · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
4.03
4.5
Ivy Touchstone
129W–82L career · 2 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
4.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.