Teams

Burk / Lindsey 3.5

2025 Mixed 18&Over-NE · 3.5 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-17vs Kelly YoungLost 12
L#1 DoublesErin Jones / Julian Cunningham vs Anna Young / Michael Duncan0-1
L#2 DoublesEddie Stephenson / Madison Stone vs Kate Bell / John Browning1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJamie Lindsey / Danielle Burk vs Drew Clement / Hester Lowe6-1, 6-3
2025-07-09vs Kelly YoungLost 12
W#1 DoublesSusanne Lindsey / Jamie Lindsey vs Anna Young / Praveen Panickar6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTracie Grammer / Julian Cunningham vs Hanson Walker / Kate Bell6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRobert Angle / Madison Stone vs Kelly Young / John Browning3-6, 3-6
2025-07-01vs Kelly YoungLost 12
L#1 DoublesJamie Clayton / Brad Clayton vs Briley Clement / Michael Duncan6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesShane Turner / Danielle Burk vs David Jackson / Suzanne Cervantes4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSusanne Lindsey / Jamie Lindsey vs John Gatlin / Hester Lowe6-0, 7-6
2025-06-24vs Kelly YoungWon 21
L#1 DoublesAlicia Green / Robert Angle vs Briley Clement / Michael Duncan1-6, 3-3
W#2 DoublesJamie Clayton / Brad Clayton vs Kelly Young / Drew Clement5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEddie Stephenson / Tracie Grammer vs Suzanne Cervantes / Praveen Panickar2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-06-10vs Kelly YoungLost 03
L#1 DoublesShane Turner / Alicia Green vs Kelly Young / John Gatlin4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesErin Jones / Robert Angle vs Hanson Walker / Kate Bell2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMadison Stone / Julian Cunningham vs David Jackson / Briley Clement5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Brad Clayton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.61
Jamie Lindsey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.51
Susanne Lindsey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Julian Cunningham
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Eddie Stephenson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Alicia Green
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Jamie Clayton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Danielle Burk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Robert Angle
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Tracie Grammer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Madison Stone
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Shane Turner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susanne Lindsey + Jamie Lindsey8367% games+16.3% vs expected
Jamie Clayton + Brad Clayton7163% games+4.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brad Clayton
24W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.63
4
Jamie Lindsey
21W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
Susanne Lindsey
53W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
Julian Cunningham
11W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Eddie Stephenson
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Alicia Green
29W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Jamie Clayton
18W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Danielle Burk
25W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Robert Angle
4W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
Tracie Grammer
16W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.92
Madison Stone
9W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shane Turner
1W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.