Teams

Dixon/Thimme/Nashville

2025 Adult 40 & Over - Nashville · 4.5 Men - Saturday 1:00 pm

14 players · average NTRP 4.43 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-17vs Parrish/NashvilleLost 04
L#1 DoublesRyan Reeve / Michael McKeown vs David Carrillo / Daniel Oxford4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRobert Grimes vs Jacob Parrish2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Murrayd / David Wuller vs Brian Finkelmeyer / Mesa Carlson3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDrew Thimme / Sean Hughes vs John Faldetta / Ryan Hitt1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-05-10vs Parrish/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesMichael McKeown / David Wuller vs Jacob Parrish / Shane Hutton5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRobert DeLucas vs Seth Benton4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Grimes / Hitesh Dhingra vs Brian Finkelmeyer / Craig Menzie3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesBrandon Dixon / GEEWOO KIM vs John Faldetta / Chris Mitchell7-5, 6-4
L#4 DoublesBrian Schaaf / David Murrayd vs Mesa Carlson / Brannon Jones3-6, 4-6
2025-05-03vs Parrish/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesDrew Thimme / Sean Hughes vs Jacob Parrish / Seth Benton2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMichael McKeown vs Brian Finkelmeyer7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobert Grimes / Hitesh Dhingra vs Chris Mitchell / Gordon Williams1-6, 3-6
2025-04-26vs Parrish/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael McKeown / David Wuller vs J Christopher Atkinson / Craig Menzie2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrandon Dixon / Hitesh Dhingra vs Ryan Hitt / Brannon Jones1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Grimes / Sean Hughes vs John Faldetta / Seth Benton1-6, 2-6
2025-04-19vs Parrish/NashvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesBrandon Dixon / David Wuller vs Brannon Jones / Seth Benton1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesGEEWOO KIM vs Mesa Carlson7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSean Hughes / Robert DeLucas vs Brian Finkelmeyer / Craig Menzie3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMichael McKeown / David Murrayd vs John Faldetta / Ryan Hitt2-6, 2-6
W#4 DoublesDrew Thimme / Randy Kerr vs David Carrillo / Shane Hutton4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-14vs Parrish/NashvilleLost 14
W#1 DoublesGEEWOO KIM / Brandon Dixon vs John Faldetta / Brannon Jones6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDrew Thimme vs Craig Menzie5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRobert Grimes / David Murrayd vs Daniel Oxford / David Carrillo2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesRobert DeLucas / Hitesh Dhingra vs J Christopher Atkinson / Mesa Carlson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#4 DoublesScott Collins / John Piovarcy vs Shane Hutton / Seth Benton2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men - Saturday 1:00 pm have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

GEEWOO KIM
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 5
Brian Schaaf
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
David Wuller
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Drew Thimme
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.14
Michael McKeown
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
4.14
David Murrayd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.07
Robert Grimes
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
4.06
Randy Kerr
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.98
Brandon Dixon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.96
Ryan Reeve
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.94
Robert DeLucas
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.94
Sean Hughes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.77
Hitesh Dhingra
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.61
John Piovarcy
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brandon Dixon + John Piovarcy134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
GEEWOO KIM
4W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Brian Schaaf
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4.5
David Wuller
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Drew Thimme
3W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael McKeown
20W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
David Murrayd
0W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
4.14
Robert Grimes
8W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
4.07
Randy Kerr
2W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
4.06
4
Brandon Dixon
13W–16L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.98
Ryan Reeve
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.96
Robert DeLucas
6W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%67%32%
3.94
Sean Hughes
1W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.94
4
Hitesh Dhingra
14W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
John Piovarcy
20W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.