Teams

STC-Ritze

2024 OH OV WINTER 18&O Mixed · Winter 18&O 6.0MXD

17 players · average NTRP 3.14 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-10vs SRTC-MillerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrandon Workman / Jenah Bartek vs Mary Miller / David Kenline6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJoseph Rothstein / Deanna Lewis vs Lindsay Bremar / Bob Bowman4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-04-26vs WPAFB-CoyWon 20
W#2 DoublesMichael Dadaian / Nancy Eben vs Rick Holbrook / Cindy Holbrook6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJoshua Lake / Lisa Metzcar vs Douglas Coy / Michele Elliott6-2, 6-2
2024-04-05vs QRRC-BeringerLost 02
L#2 DoublesLisa Metzcar / Joshua Lake vs Georgianne Lowman / Eric Lowman4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDeanna Lewis / Todd Haines vs Mark Smallwood / Sonja Smallwood1-6, 2-6
2024-03-29vs SRTC-MillerWon 20
W#1 DoublesTodd Haines / Gina Brenner vs Julie Kenline / Bob Bowman4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Dadaian / Nancy Eben vs Pat Forster / James Bremar6-2, 6-1
2024-03-23vs WPAFB-CoyLost 01
L#2 DoublesJenah Bartek / Kane Feltner vs Shannon Pearson / Katie Ruef6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2024-03-15vs SRTC-MillerWon 20
W#2 DoublesBrandon Workman / Angela Fodale vs Mary Miller / Todd Kissel7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoseph Rothstein / Nancy Eben vs Bob Bowman / Lindsay Bremar7-5, 6-4
2024-02-09vs WPAFB-CoyWon 10
W#3 DoublesDaryl Parks / Deanna Lewis vs Scott Robinson / Renee Vandeventer6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Winter 18&O 6.0MXD
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1STC-Ritze7220720218
2QRRC-Beringer63171025228
3SRTC-Miller45111635252

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Lisa Metzcar
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Todd Haines
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Mike Ritze
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Brandon Workman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Jenah Bartek
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.22
Daryl Parks
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.13
Angela Fodale
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.97
Andrew Fodale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Nancy Eben
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
2.89
Dave Moravek
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Michael Dadaian
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.80
Joseph Rothstein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Jacob Mozer
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.68
Kane Feltner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Joshua Lake
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.19
Deanna Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Valerie Webb
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Eben + Joseph Rothstein5157% games+17.6% vs expected
Dave Moravek + Nancy Eben4254% games+16.5% vs expected
Dave Moravek + Jenah Bartek5253% games+8.4% vs expected
Lisa Metzcar + Joshua Lake5356% gamesnot enough data
Angela Fodale + Andrew Fodale4152% gamesnot enough data
Mike Ritze + Nancy Eben314 matchesnot enough data
Daryl Parks + Deanna Lewis213 matchesnot enough data
Deanna Lewis + Mike Ritze123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Metzcar
375W–177L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
Todd Haines
97W–56L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
Mike Ritze
209W–139L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Brandon Workman
37W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
Jenah Bartek
105W–162L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Daryl Parks
56W–109L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Angela Fodale
30W–23L career · 7 lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
3.13
3
Andrew Fodale
31W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.97
Nancy Eben
77W–130L career · 8 lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
2.90
3
Dave Moravek
79W–33L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.89
Michael Dadaian
67W–28L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
2.84
Joseph Rothstein
66W–46L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Jacob Mozer
36W–34L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%93%5%
2.79
Kane Feltner
27W–49L career · 1 line in 2024
8%91%1%
2.68
Joshua Lake
14W–31L career · 2 lines in 2024
32%67%<1%
2.56
2.5
Deanna Lewis
35W–92L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.19
Valerie Webb
32W–31L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.