Teams

MARION/Mclauchlin/Men/7.5

2022 Marion Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-12-10vs FK - KieferWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristopher Clements / John Mcmichael vs Stephen Bernard / Sridhar Sagili3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristopher Ulbricht / Isaac Vergara vs Scott Kiefer / Fernando Mercado-Cruz6-2, 6-1
2022-12-04vs FK - KieferLost 01
L#1 DoublesGregory Graham / Peter Grosshans vs WILLIAM STEIGNER / Charles Lakatos3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-12-02vs FK - KieferLost 01
L#3 DoublesVuday Nandur / Glen Gandiongco vs Paul Franck / Nitin Bala5-7, 6-7
2022-10-21vs FK - KieferWon 10
W#3 DoublesScott Anthony / Peter Grosshans vs Grady Grimes / Scott Kiefer4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-10-14vs FK - KieferWon 20
W#1 DoublesGregory Graham / John Mcmichael vs Michael Garlisi / Ralf Barckhausen7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesChristopher Ulbricht / Glen Gandiongco vs Paul Franck / Fernando Mercado-Cruz6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Christopher Ulbricht
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Peter Grosshans
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.50
3.44
Dillon Lagano
published 3.5
3.29
Scott Anthony
published
3.16
Glen Gandiongco
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.16
Isaac Vergara
published 3.5
John Mcmichael
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Vuday Nandur
published
Weston Wise
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Ulbricht + Peter Grosshans4447% gamesnot enough data
Scott Anthony + Christopher Clements2346% gamesnot enough data
Glen Gandiongco + Peter Grosshans123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Ulbricht
127W–102L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Peter Grosshans
148W–115L career · 6 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Christopher Clements
21W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.50
3.5
Dillon Lagano
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.44
Scott Anthony
17W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Glen Gandiongco
123W–124L career · 5 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Isaac Vergara
3W–10L career · type S · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
John Mcmichael
75W–35L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Vuday Nandur
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Weston Wise
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.