Teams

SBraga

2022 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-09Won 20
W#1 DoublesCassy Albertson / Paige Alford vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Braga / Shelley Truman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-09-25vs AKalinowskiWon 10
W#1 DoublesPaige Alford / Kathryn White vs Jennifer van Campen / Jennifer Sigler6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2022-09-18vs BLeippeLost 02
L#1 DoublesPaige Alford / Sarah Copley vs Amanda Mueller / Marguerite Rogers6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAllyson Salts / Cassy Albertson vs Eliza Bobryshev / Marie Gelston2-6, 2-6
2022-09-11vs SLittletonLost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Copley / Cassy Albertson vs Julie Dougherty / Katherine King2-6, 4-6
2022-09-07vs JAndrews/HenryLost 02
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Braga / Jaime Clark vs Julianne Andrews / Jennifer Badham1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPaige Alford / Chrissy Hartsfield vs Settle Monroe / Spruill Mayhew3-6, 4-6
2022-08-30vs AKalinowskiLost 01
L#2 DoublesPaige Alford / Sarah Copley vs Elizabeth Marriott / Erin Hemminger1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-08-14vs BLeippeLost 02
L#1 DoublesCassy Albertson / Kathryn White vs Marie Gelston / Natalie Rodriguez5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Braga / Nikki Hastings vs Wendy Sielaty / Cassie Pence0-6, 2-6
2022-08-07vs SLittletonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJaime Clark / Suzanne Braga vs Kristi Gilreath / Erin Wynia7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCassy Albertson / Chrissy Hartsfield vs Tina Goertz / Rossi Evans6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Jaime Clark
published 3.5
3.13
Paige Alford
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
2.81
Tara Boyd
published
2.72
Kathryn White
published
2.70
Suzanne Braga
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.69
Cassy Albertson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.68
Sarah Copley
published
Nikki Hastings
published
Shelley Truman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paige Alford + Cassy Albertson314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jaime Clark
10W–18L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Paige Alford
121W–138L career · 10 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
Tara Boyd
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
Kathryn White
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Suzanne Braga
36W–55L career · 4 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Cassy Albertson
40W–39L career · 5 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Sarah Copley
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
Nikki Hastings
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Shelley Truman
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.