Teams

WOCC Schaaf / Dey

2021 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Weekday Adult 18 & Over Women 4.0

7 players · average NTRP 4.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-28vs Raintree FallinWon 10
W#2 DoublesJulia Calamita / Anne Elles vs Michele Riedel / Lisa Harmon6-4, 6-3
2021-06-18vs ACAC RiddleLost 01
L#1 DoublesSharan Wilder / Anne Elles vs Alcira Varela de Guzman / Lee Moore4-6, 4-6
2021-06-15vs CCV AveryLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnne Elles / Sharan Wilder vs Courtney Harper / Karen Williamson2-6, 3-6
2021-06-08vs RCC SamuelsLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnne Elles / Sharan Wilder vs Pam Walsh / Connie Jervey3-6, 0-6
2021-06-01vs Woodlake RitterWon 10
W#2 DoublesSharan Wilder / Anne Elles vs Peggy McElgunn / Denise Giaccone6-3, 6-2
2021-05-28vs Westwood Hause 4.0Won 10
W#2 SinglesAnne Elles vs Amy Mulholland6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Weekday Adult 18 & Over Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Laura Granger
published 4.5
3.85
Anne Elles
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.73
Sharon Fuller
published
3.63
Niki Smith
published
3.48
Julia Calamita
published
3.44
Laurie Schaaf
published
Sharan Wilder
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Granger + Anne Elles4550% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Laura Granger
131W–99L career · no lines in 2021
72%28%<1%
3.92
4
Anne Elles
147W–130L career · 10 lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
3.85
Sharon Fuller
9W–6L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
Niki Smith
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
3.63
Julia Calamita
1W–6L career · no lines in 2021
58%42%<1%
3.48
Laurie Schaaf
0W–5L career · no lines in 2021
69%31%<1%
3.44
Sharan Wilder
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.