Teams

LA - MountainGators

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over – LA · LA - Men 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-21vs LA- TremblorsSplit 22
L#1 DoublesRaymond Wan / Rahul Chhablani vs Riley Klarkowski / Aneesh Kudaravalli1-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesDavid Horvitz vs Min Fan6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSteven Price / Mark Troy vs Sahit Bollineni / Gregory Vaynovsky6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesTERRENCE CHERMAK vs Daniel de Santo1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesNeal Morse / Rahul Chhablani vs Ryan McCann / Aaron Hauser2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesEli Steinberg vs Dan Hwang6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAlen Cohen / Steven Price vs Patrick Koitzsch / Alex Vanderleest1-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesPrasad Parmeshwaran vs Branson Enani3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTERRENCE CHERMAK / Daniel Shalom vs Ben Blair / Anthony Canapi0-6, 2-6
2025-05-24vs LA- TremblorsWon 41
W#1 DoublesMark Troy / Raymond Wan vs Riley Klarkowski / Stig Pedersen6-0, 7-6
W#1 SinglesPrasad Parmeshwaran vs Daniel de Santo6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTERRENCE CHERMAK / Jeff Biederman vs Sahit Bollineni / Gregory Vaynovsky4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesDavid Horvitz vs Min Fan6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRahul Chhablani / Neal Morse vs Aneesh Kudaravalli / Drew Crane6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesPrasad Parmeshwaran vs Dan Hwang2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEthan Steinberg / Alen Cohen vs Aaron Hauser / Ryan McCann2-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesEli Steinberg vs Ben Blair6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Men 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Steven Price
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
David Horvitz
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
3.03
Prasad Parmeshwaran
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.90
Rahul Chhablani
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.76
Ethan Steinberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Raymond Wan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Mark Troy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.70
Neal Morse
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.68
Jeff Biederman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Alen Cohen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Daniel Shalom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.44
TERRENCE CHERMAK
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Eli Steinberg
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Jordan Toplitzky
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Price + Ethan Steinberg5261% games+21.8% vs expected
David Horvitz + Prasad Parmeshwaran4161% games+8.4% vs expected
Rahul Chhablani + Raymond Wan3554% games+2.2% vs expected
Mark Troy + Alen Cohen1440% games−1.6% vs expected
Daniel Shalom + Alen Cohen1442% games−7.9% vs expected
TERRENCE CHERMAK + Daniel Shalom044 matchesnot enough data
Rahul Chhablani + Steven Price314 matchesnot enough data
Rahul Chhablani + Neal Morse134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Steven Price
13W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.17
3
David Horvitz
18W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
Prasad Parmeshwaran
21W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.03
Rahul Chhablani
19W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Ethan Steinberg
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
2.76
Raymond Wan
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Mark Troy
9W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Neal Morse
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.70
Jeff Biederman
2W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Alen Cohen
4W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Daniel Shalom
3W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57
TERRENCE CHERMAK
2W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.44
Eli Steinberg
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jordan Toplitzky
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.