Teams

Epple 6.5 Combo

2026 Harford Combo · Harford Combo 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.31 / MARYLAND

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · Harford Combo 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Shertzer - Kiss My Ace 6.5000000
2Epple 6.5 Combo000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Janet Oldewurtel
published 3.5
3.35
Erin Deneen
published 3.5
3.33
Erica Epple
published 3.5
3.24
Rebecca Pape
published 3.5
3.17
Robin Piazza
published 3.5
3.12
Heather Golden
published
3.03
Amy Allman
published 3
2.98
Laura Chabalowski
published
2.75
2.67
Amy Clough
published 3
2.65
Lee Ann Edwards
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erica Epple + Janet Oldewurtel7362% games−2.4% vs expected
Robin Piazza + Janet Oldewurtel8554% gamesnot enough data
Janet Oldewurtel + Rebecca Pape7259% gamesnot enough data
Robin Piazza + Amy Allman4350% gamesnot enough data
Robin Piazza + Rebecca Pape4356% gamesnot enough data
Christine Cloonan + Amy Allman4255% gamesnot enough data
Robin Piazza + Erica Epple4257% gamesnot enough data
Christine Cloonan + Robin Piazza5067% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Janet Oldewurtel
68W–30L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Erin Deneen
35W–31L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Erica Epple
60W–56L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Rebecca Pape
56W–40L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Robin Piazza
66W–66L career · type A · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
Heather Golden
7W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.12
3
Amy Allman
51W–36L career · no lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
Laura Chabalowski
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Christine Cloonan
48W–34L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Amy Clough
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Lee Ann Edwards
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
14%86%1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.