Teams

Freese

2024 Harford Adult 18 & Over · Harford Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.12 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-18vs McClellandWon 21
W#1 SinglesSandra Kick vs Laurie Scheidle6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCathy Preisendorfer / Vicki Williamson vs Natalie Bryson / Melanie Goss4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaurie Freese / Susan Wiercinski vs Kathleen Dolan / Kerrin O'Neill2-6, 2-6
2024-06-14vs McClellandSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDanielle Barry / Cathy Preisendorfer vs Joanne Holehouse / Bonnie Keating5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLaurie Freese / Tina Holmes vs Mary McClelland / Melanie Goss6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2024-06-10vs McClellandWon 21
L#1 DoublesDanielle Barry / Laurie Freese vs Laurie Klapka / Kerrin O'Neill6-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesSandra Kick vs Melanie Goss6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCathy Preisendorfer / Vicki Williamson vs Laura Barwick / Geri Riley6-3, 6-3
2024-06-07vs McClellandLost 01
L#3 DoublesCathy Preisendorfer / Susan Wiercinski vs Melanie Goss / Marianne Michels3-6, 3-6
2024-05-20vs McClellandLost 01
L#3 DoublesTheresa Hodge / Cathy Preisendorfer vs Marianne Michels / Geri Riley4-6, 6-7
2024-05-18vs McClellandLost 01
L#3 DoublesLaurie Freese / Cathy Preisendorfer vs Kathleen Dolan / Geri Riley2-6, 6-7
2024-05-14vs McClellandLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaurie Freese / Theresa Hodge vs Melanie Goss / Marianne Michels6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2024-05-05vs McClellandSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSandra Kick / Cathy Preisendorfer vs Laurie Klapka / Kerrin O'Neill0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLaurie Freese / Danielle Barry vs Mary McClelland / Marianne Michels3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Harford Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Vicki Williamson
published
3.97
Danielle Barry
published 4.5
3.90
Cathy Preisendorfer
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.82
Laurie Freese
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Kate Dempsey
published
3.67
Sandra Kick
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Tina Holmes
published
Karen Robertson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurie Freese + Cathy Preisendorfer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vicki Williamson
43W–40L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
4.38
4.5
Danielle Barry
9W–25L career · no lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
3.97
4
Cathy Preisendorfer
145W–136L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Laurie Freese
100W–84L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.82
Kate Dempsey
29W–22L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Sandra Kick
97W–89L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.67
Tina Holmes
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
Karen Robertson
10W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.