Teams

LEBTC BLUE

2025 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.23 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-11vs HRCA-N REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesKathy Dudek / Maria Banta vs Alice Soderman / Shastin Hunzicker4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRoberta Seifert / Heidi Peterson vs Jana Warwick / Linda Murray0-6, 1-6
2025-06-04vs SS-H BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaria Banta / Christina Schwartz vs Ellen Thompson / CELESTE SIADE6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDorothy Carr / Kathy Dudek vs Brenda Lillard / Jennifer Cree0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCatherine Zeberlein / Becki Jernigan vs Carin Buster / Joyce Ziomek6-3, 6-3
2025-05-28vs LTFC NAVYLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaria Banta / Christina Schwartz vs Jane Jussila / Helen Lazzell6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathy Dudek / Erica Giesen vs Melissa King / Jill Myers0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLisa DeBastos / Becki Jernigan vs Maria Bales - * / Lisa Robertson3-6, 0-6
2025-05-23vs HG ORANGELost 12
L#1 DoublesDorothy Carr / Catherine Zeberlein vs Virginia Foster / Mary Thompson6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBecki Jernigan / Lisa DeBastos vs Theresa Hendrix / Gloria Clark7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRoberta Seifert / Heidi Peterson vs Maria Blakney / Jean Mortellaro2-6, 4-6
2025-05-21vs LEBTC GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesDorothy Carr / Erica Giesen vs LISA HAGEN / Sandy Stocker1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSoyon Bueno / Becki Jernigan vs Alison Cejka / Becky Glenn2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRoberta Seifert / Lisa DeBastos vs Joyce Naylon / Cinda Nab3-6, 1-6
2025-05-14vs HRCA-N ORANGEWon 21
W#1 DoublesCatherine Zeberlein / Erica Giesen vs Teresa Orr / Beth Beers6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSoyon Bueno / Dorothy Carr vs Marika Fodor / Anita Kinder3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHeidi Peterson / Roberta Seifert vs Julia Zawalski / Sally Heaton3-6, 6-7
2025-04-30vs SS-H GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristina Schwartz / Becki Jernigan vs Joy Coulter-Brown / Tracy Pursell6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKathy Dudek / Catherine Zeberlein vs Patti Coker / Tricia Wright6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesErica Giesen / Lisa DeBastos vs Tracy Powers / MaryBeth Doerr6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Christina Schwartz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Maria Banta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Kathy Dudek
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.09
Susan OBrien
published
3.06
Erica Giesen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.05
Catherine Zeberlein
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.92
Lisa DeBastos
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.83
Dorothy Carr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.72
Kellie Naclerio
published 3
2.70
Roberta Seifert
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.63
Becki Jernigan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.60
Soyon Bueno
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Heidi Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kellie Naclerio + Susan OBrien3256% games+8.5% vs expected
Dorothy Carr + Soyon Bueno8262% games+7.0% vs expected
Becki Jernigan + Soyon Bueno131347% games+3.5% vs expected
Dorothy Carr + Catherine Zeberlein191160% games+2.8% vs expected
Catherine Zeberlein + Erica Giesen10755% games+2.2% vs expected
Dorothy Carr + Erica Giesen15958% games+2.0% vs expected
Kellie Naclerio + Catherine Zeberlein171354% games−0.9% vs expected
Christina Schwartz + Maria Banta3352% games−6.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christina Schwartz
105W–83L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Maria Banta
117W–84L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Kathy Dudek
65W–63L career · 4 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.09
Susan OBrien
76W–50L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Erica Giesen
74W–50L career · 4 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.06
3.5
Catherine Zeberlein
165W–97L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Lisa DeBastos
49W–103L career · 4 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Dorothy Carr
125W–82L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
2.83
3
Kellie Naclerio
121W–72L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Roberta Seifert
47W–101L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Becki Jernigan
107W–99L career · 10 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.63
3
Soyon Bueno
139W–134L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Heidi Peterson
12W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.