Teams

Brown, Patrick

2023 Adult 40 & Over-JXN · Men 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-04-16vs Imran, MoinWon 10
W#2 DoublesPat Baldwin / Patrick Brown vs Brian Germany / Randy Harris6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2023-04-10vs Warren, JakeLost 01
L#3 DoublesPatrick Brown / Foster Jordan vs Brice Till / Jeff Turnipseed7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2023-04-03Won 10
W#3 DoublesPatrick Brown / Pat Baldwin vs Hubert Reynolds / Eric Walters7-5, 6-2
2023-03-27Won 10
W#1 SinglesPatrick Brown vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-06vs Imran, MoinWon 10
W#1 DoublesPatrick Brown / Scott Holston vs Jitendra Sahoo / Feng Zhang7-5, 6-2
2023-02-27vs Carmody, JeffreyLost 01
L#1 SinglesPatrick Brown vs William Eversole0-6, 2-6
2023-02-13vs Warren, JakeLost 01
L#3 DoublesPatrick Brown / Dave Miller vs Todd Garlington / Taurean Buchanan3-6, 0-6
2023-01-30vs Jenkins, StanleyLost 01
L#1 SinglesPatrick Brown vs Stanley Jenkins3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Scott Holston
published
3.12
Patrick Brown
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.11
Oliver Catchings
published
3.09
Mitch Stentiford
published
3.09
Jay Lake
published
3.06
Foster Jordan
published 3.5
2.92
Oscar de Leon
published
2.79
Michael Lang
published
2.65
Mark Huff
published
2.64
Pat Baldwin
published
Jerry Farr
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Foster Jordan + Mark Huff3445% games−1.2% vs expected
Michael Lang + Jay Lake0734% games−15.0% vs expected
Scott Holston + Oscar de Leon1639% games−15.8% vs expected
Patrick Brown + Oscar de Leon134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott Holston
37W–51L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.17
3.5
Patrick Brown
68W–131L career · 8 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.12
Oliver Catchings
4W–16L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.11
Mitch Stentiford
29W–48L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.09
Jay Lake
2W–16L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Foster Jordan
11W–32L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.06
Oscar de Leon
2W–11L career · no lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
2.92
Michael Lang
1W–16L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.79
Mark Huff
6W–19L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
2.65
Pat Baldwin
4W–23L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
2.64
Jerry Farr
18W–24L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.