Teams

KF.German

2025 CTRL Adult 55 & Over · Adult 55 & Over 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-26vs TOC.NowellWon 20
W#1 DoublesEric Harbour / Dirk German vs Scott Riley / Daniel Knox3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCraig Cardella / David Bruner vs Ken Nowell / John Diamond7-5, 6-4
2025-04-05vs TOC.JavalkarWon 10
W#1 DoublesCraig Cardella / David Bruner vs Srinath Ekkad / Ray Boehmer6-4, 6-3
2025-03-29vs ACP.MorrowSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRoger Kurtz / Claude Ruffieux vs David Rowe / W Troutman4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Bruner / Craig Cardella vs Daniel Breazeale / Jeffrey Madia7-5, 6-3
2025-03-22Won 20
W#2 DoublesClaude Ruffieux / Randy Lakey vs Brad Nelson / Andy Ferrell6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCecil Martin / Hans Norland vs Kevin Fitzgerald / Alan Roberts6-3, 6-0
2025-03-15vs TOC.NowellWon 20
W#1 DoublesDirk German / Eric Harbour vs Daniel Knox / Tom Sparks6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCraig Cardella / David Bruner vs Scott Riley / Scott Anderson6-4, 7-5
2025-03-10vs ACP.MorrowSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDirk German / Eric Harbour vs Tom Morrow / Bryan Simpson2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Bruner / Craig Cardella vs Daniel Breazeale / Dennis Coon6-2, 6-4
2025-03-01vs TOC.JavalkarWon 20
W#1 DoublesCraig Cardella / David Bruner vs Sathisha Kumar / Terry Davidson6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesWilliam Adams / Hans Norland vs Shirish Javalkar / Edward Li6-3, 6-4
2025-02-15vs PW.StoneWon 10
W#1 DoublesCraig Cardella / David Bruner vs Richard Smith / Bill Nagel6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Eric Harbour
published 4
3.87
Craig Cardella
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.73
Claude Ruffieux
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Roger Kurtz
published
3.67
Dirk German
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Richard Kimball
published
3.63
Cecil Martin
published 4
3.60
Hans Norland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claude Ruffieux + Craig Cardella3743% games+2.9% vs expected
Hans Norland + Dirk German123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Eric Harbour
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
4.05
4
Craig Cardella
53W–70L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Claude Ruffieux
125W–153L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Roger Kurtz
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Dirk German
96W–68L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.67
Richard Kimball
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Cecil Martin
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.63
4
Hans Norland
35W–50L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.