Teams

Jacaranda Duncan

2023 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over ESL Fall · 8.0 W Monday

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_5

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-12-05vs Longwood SeiderLost 02
L#1 DoublesAna Areosa / Connie Weiss vs Joy Voke / Beth Costa2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarla Rodman / Penny Durham vs Lenore Funes / Yvonne Ghilardi3-6, 4-6
2022-11-21vs LWR SosaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAna Areosa / Janet Kramer vs Kathy Rain / Sheila Sosa6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDeanna Allard / Barbara Belanger vs Lu Circelli / Carol Kloeppel5-7, 4-6
2022-11-14vs LBK Public SchonhoffWon 20
W#2 DoublesJane Hurman / Petra Klos vs Lilia Johnson / Margaret Stanton7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDeanna Allard / Barbara Belanger vs Ute Vela-Marquez / Allison Byrd7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-11-07vs LWR ZeiglerWon 21
W#1 DoublesDiane Crews / Carla Rodman vs Betty Jo Zeigler / Diana Stadelnikas6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAna Areosa / Connie Weiss vs Kim Eck / Donna Love6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesConstance Duncan / Lynn Inganamort vs Karen Nicholson / Marcia Frost6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2022-10-31vs River Strand QuirosWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarla Rodman / Diane Crews vs Nancy Finman / Kara Beene7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPetra Klos / Connie Weiss vs Judi Wilson / Hattie Grimsley7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPenny Durham / Jane Hurman vs Bernadette King / Chris Poole5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-10-24vs Longwood SeiderWon 20
W#1 DoublesConstance Duncan / Lynn Inganamort vs Donna Hannigan / Dorene Seider6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAna Areosa / Petra Klos vs Wendy Hillock / Cherie Lopez1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-10-17vs LWR ZeiglerWon 21
W#1 DoublesConnie Weiss / Ana Areosa vs Karen Nicholson / Sheila Perry3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesConstance Duncan / Jane Hurman vs Betty Jo Zeigler / Marina Cameron6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarla Rodman / Deanna Allard vs Donna Love / Kim Eck4-6, 2-6
2022-10-10vs LWR SosaWon 20
W#1 DoublesPetra Klos / Connie Weiss vs Lu Circelli / Kathy Rain6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesConstance Duncan / Janet Kramer vs Angela Heck / Carol Kloeppel6-4, 6-4
2022-10-05vs LBK Public SchonhoffWon 20
W#2 DoublesAna Areosa / Connie Weiss vs Jackie Gibbins / Helen Turner6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDeanna Allard / Carla Rodman vs Margaret Stanton / Ute Vela-Marquez6-1, 6-1
2022-09-26vs River Strand QuirosWon 30
W#1 DoublesAna Areosa / Janet Kramer vs Nancy Finman / Kara Beene6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesConstance Duncan / Lynn Inganamort vs Hattie Grimsley / Judi Wilson1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDeanna Allard / Carla Rodman vs Sharyn Quiros / Chris Poole7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 W Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Susan Gammon
published
3.90
Ana Areosa
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.79
Diane Crews
published 4
3.79
Constance Duncan
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.68
Connie Weiss
published 4
3.64
Barbara Belanger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Jane Hurman
published
3.63
Deanna Allard
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.50
Carla Rodman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.41
Sandra Poston
published
Janet Kramer
published
Lynn Inganamort
published
Penny Durham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Petra Klos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deanna Allard + Constance Duncan291757% games+0.2% vs expected
Penny Durham + Carla Rodman101451% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Belanger + Deanna Allard11753% gamesnot enough data
Petra Klos + Constance Duncan3449% gamesnot enough data
Petra Klos + Ana Areosa314 matchesnot enough data
Petra Klos + Deanna Allard044 matchesnot enough data
Ana Areosa + Janet Kramer314 matchesnot enough data
Ana Areosa + Deanna Allard134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Gammon
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
4.12
4
Ana Areosa
141W–119L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.90
4
Diane Crews
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Constance Duncan
148W–117L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Connie Weiss
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Barbara Belanger
71W–43L career · 2 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.64
Jane Hurman
11W–1L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Deanna Allard
122W–106L career · 5 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Carla Rodman
68W–105L career · 6 lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.50
Sandra Poston
48W–39L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
3.41
Janet Kramer
20W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lynn Inganamort
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Penny Durham
29W–43L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Petra Klos
23W–31L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.