Teams

Sp.Johnson18M

2025 Capital Mixed 18 & Over · 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-04vs Sh.Baggett18MWon 10
W#3 DoublesAndrew Pham / McKinsey Blount vs Scott Underwood / Lindsey Klein6-0, 6-3
2025-07-14vs Le.Ji18MLost 01
L#2 DoublesMcKinsey Blount / Zachary Dinkins vs Lei Ji / Kelsey Kowalski3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-07-07vs Jo.Whalen18MWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrew Pham / McKinsey Blount vs Craig Schauman / McKenzie Keenan Osman6-3, 6-1
2025-06-30vs Ja.Liner18MWon 10
W#1 DoublesSpencer Johnson / McKinsey Blount vs Jason Liner / Erica Jackson6-2, 6-0
2025-06-23vs Sk.Poole18MWon 10
W#1 DoublesMcKinsey Blount / Sean Toner vs Jonathan Adams / Ashlie Adams6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-16vs Ra.Xu18MWon 10
W#1 DoublesMcKinsey Blount / Andrew Pham vs Nikki DAmbrose / Gabriel Iocco6-3, 6-2
2025-06-09Won 10
W#2 DoublesSpencer Johnson / McKinsey Blount vs Holly Moore / Randy Richardson6-2, 6-2
2025-06-02vs Li.Arcos18MWon 10
W#2 DoublesMcKinsey Blount / Andrew Pham vs John Hardin / Hannon Thorn6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
McKinsey Blount
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
3.88
Spencer Johnson
published
3.73
Elizabeth Heald
published
3.69
Meghan Howard
published
3.68
Allie Greene
published 4
3.63
Sean Toner
published
3.59
3.46
Jamie Harford
published
3.34
Elizabeth Short
published
Jacob Ramsey
published
Zachary Dinkins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Spencer Johnson + Elizabeth Heald123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
McKinsey Blount
64W–14L career · 8 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
4.30
Spencer Johnson
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
Elizabeth Heald
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Meghan Howard
29W–12L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Allie Greene
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Sean Toner
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
4
Amelia Blankenship
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.59
Jamie Harford
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.46
Elizabeth Short
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Jacob Ramsey
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Zachary Dinkins
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.