Teams

MSIL A18&O 3.0M Smith-Champaign

2024 MSIL Adult 18 & Over -MSIL East League · East MSIL A18 & O 3.0M

15 players · average NTRP 3.07 / MID-SOUTH ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-27vs MSIL A18&O 3.0M Park-ChampaignWon 32
L#1 DoublesCarl Guo / Jack Morgan vs Sangwon Park / Kim Junghyun6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRam Alagappan vs Yongbin Kim7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTravis Davis / Jordon Smith vs Jaemin Yang / Jaehoon Jung6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSteven Peckins vs Siyoung Park5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJake Rundall / Dantzler Smith vs Hyunjun Nam / Hyeonseok Jee6-1, 6-4
2024-07-13vs MSIL A18&O 3.0M Park-ChampaignLost 14
W#1 DoublesAndrew Flores / Jose Andino vs Sung Min Moon / Jaemin Yang6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAbraham Eugenio vs Jaehoon Jung3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJeff Kurtz / Steven Peckins vs Taewoo Kim / Hyeonseok Jee6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJordon Smith vs Siyoung Park3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJake Rundall / Dantzler Smith vs Sangwon Park / Hyunjun Nam6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-07-06vs MSIL A18&O 3.0M Park-ChampaignLost 14
W#1 DoublesTravis Davis / Thomas Sanner vs Jaehoon Jung / Seungjin Oh6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesRam Alagappan vs Kim Junghyun3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJose Andino / Jack Morgan vs Sangwon Park / Jaemin Yang3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesSteven Peckins vs Sung Min Moon6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDantzler Smith / Jake Rundall vs Yongbin Kim / Siyoung Park1-6, 1-6
2024-06-29vs MSIL A18&O 3.0M Park-ChampaignSplit 22
W#1 DoublesTravis Davis / Thomas Sanner vs Yongbin Kim / Jaehoon Jung6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesRam Alagappan vs Sung Min Moon6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDhruve Ashar / Jeff Kurtz vs Hyeonseok Jee / Taewoo Kim2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDantzler Smith / Jordon Smith vs Sangwon Park / Hyunjun Nam3-6, 1-6
2024-06-22vs MSIL A18&O 3.0M Park-ChampaignSplit 22
W#1 DoublesTravis Davis / Jack Morgan vs Kim Junghyun / Jaehoon Jung6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSteven Peckins vs Jaemin Yang6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJeff Kurtz / Dhruve Ashar vs Hyunjun Nam / Seungjin Oh6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJordon Smith / Jake Rundall vs Sangwon Park / Yongbin Kim1-6, 0-6
2024-06-01vs MSIL A18&O 3.0M Park-ChampaignLost 04
L#1 SinglesAbraham Eugenio vs Kim Junghyun1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSteven Peckins / Jordon Smith vs Seungjin Oh / Jaehoon Jung1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJake Rundall vs Youngjoo Jung1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJose Andino / Jeff Kurtz vs Jaemin Yang / Sung Min Moon5-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · East MSIL A18 & O 3.0M
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MSIL A18&O 3.0M Park-Champaign5121925225
2MSIL A18&O 3.0M Smith-Champaign1592145301

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Jack Morgan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Thomas Sanner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Carl Guo
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Jose Andino
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Abraham Eugenio
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Andrew Flores
published 3
Dhruve Ashar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Dantzler Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Jake Rundall
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.58
Steven Peckins
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
Jeff Kurtz
published
Jordon Smith
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Ram Alagappan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Timothy McMahon
published
Travis Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jake Rundall + Dantzler Smith224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jack Morgan
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Thomas Sanner
21W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.23
3
Carl Guo
22W–25L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%90%10%
2.83
Jose Andino
8W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Abraham Eugenio
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Andrew Flores
no matches on record · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Dhruve Ashar
10W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Dantzler Smith
13W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Jake Rundall
7W–18L career · 5 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
Steven Peckins
4W–15L career · 5 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
2.58
Jeff Kurtz
1W–19L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jordon Smith
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ram Alagappan
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Timothy McMahon
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Travis Davis
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.