Teams

Ch.Nystrom18S

2026 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Men

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-22vs Br.McLean18SWon 30
W#1 SinglesClay Parker vs Andrew Collicutt6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesPatrick Webb vs Ramsey Yehia6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesJoseph Massey vs Brendan DeMacy6-0, 6-3
2026-07-15vs Pa.Vickers18S3.0Split 11
L#1 SinglesClay Parker vs Christian Guthrie2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJoseph Massey vs Noah Marley6-1, 6-1
2026-07-08vs Ro.Harris18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesClay Parker vs Patrick Dougherty1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-24vs Jo.Williamson18SSplit 11
L#2 SinglesJoseph Massey vs Joseph Williamson6-7, 6-7
W#3 SinglesClay Parker vs Ian Villanueva6-0, 6-3
2026-06-17vs Ma.Morriston18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesJoseph Massey vs Surin Patel6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesClay Parker vs Christopher Leonard6-1, 6-0
2026-06-10vs De.Byrd18S3.0Won 20
W#1 SinglesClay Parker vs Paul Sherman7-5, 7-6
W#3 SinglesPatrick Webb vs Matthew Givens6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-03vs Br.McLean18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesPatrick Webb vs David Kelly6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJoseph Massey vs Cameron Kirby4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-05-27vs Pa.Vickers18S3.0Lost 03
L#1 SinglesJoseph Massey vs Andrew Adams4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesClay Parker vs Ian Lay0-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesPatrick Webb vs Ryan Catrine0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Clay Parker
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 3
3.01
Joseph Massey
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.99
Patrick Webb
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.79
Cam Copley
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Webb + Joseph Massey213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Clay Parker
25W–17L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.08
Joseph Massey
14W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
Patrick Webb
12W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Cam Copley
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%5%
2.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.