Teams

QRRC-Madoffori

2026 OH OV SUMMER A55&O Dayton · 2026 SUMMER A55&O 7.0M Dayton

15 players · average NTRP 3.40 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-22vs KTC-PickrelWon 20
W#2 DoublesMike Ritze / Christopher Bennington vs Philip Pierce / Eric McHenry7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMike Madoffori / Mark Broerman vs Thomas Chillinsky / Robert Kastler6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-08-15vs KTC-PickrelWon 10
W#2 DoublesBryan Ulery / Christopher Bennington vs Thomas Chillinsky / Tony Brown6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-07-18vs KTC-PickrelSplit 11
W#2 DoublesGreg Haack / Cecil Mullins vs Richard Pickrel / Corey Lam6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMike Madoffori / Dave Measley vs Philip Pierce / Jon Farley6-7, 6-7
2026-07-11vs KTC-PickrelWon 30
W#1 DoublesTodd Haines / Stephen Ward vs Thomas Tisler / Michael Stankas6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesWilliam Baldwin / Mark Broerman vs Tony Brown / Eric McHenry6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichael Dadaian / Greg Haack vs Richard Pickrel / John Daley6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2026-06-27vs KTC-PickrelWon 10
W#3 DoublesMike Madoffori / Mark Broerman vs Eric McHenry / Robert Kastler7-6, 7-5
2026-06-20vs KTC-PickrelSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMike Ritze / Todd Haines vs Thomas Tisler / Thomas Chillinsky6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesWilliam Baldwin / Bryan Ulery vs Richard Pickrel / John Daley3-6, 3-6
2026-06-13vs KTC-PickrelWon 21
L#1 DoublesMike Ritze / William Baldwin vs Richard Pickrel / John Daley7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTodd Haines / Stephen Ward vs Thomas Tisler / Eric McHenry6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichael Dadaian / Greg Haack vs Corey Lam / Jon Farley6-0, 6-1
2026-06-06vs KTC-PickrelSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGreg Haack / Cecil Mullins vs Richard Pickrel / John Daley0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKyle Webb / Mark Broerman vs Corey Lam / Eric McHenry6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2026 SUMMER A55&O 7.0M Dayton
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1QRRC-Madoffori7017410149
2KTC-Pickrel0741735234

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Jorge Crespo
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.72
Greg Haack
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.49
Kyle Webb
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.41
Todd Haines
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Clayton Burkle
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.37
Mike Ritze
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Dave Measley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Rodolfo Aguilera
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.22
Mike Madoffori
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Mark Broerman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Bryan Ulery
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Christopher Bennington
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.87
Cecil Mullins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.84
Michael Dadaian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Stephen Ward
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Todd Haines + Mike Ritze5161% games+7.1% vs expected
Kyle Webb + Greg Haack6160% games+3.3% vs expected
Kyle Webb + Mike Madoffori5258% games−1.2% vs expected
Mike Madoffori + Christopher Bennington11458% games−2.6% vs expected
Dave Measley + Jorge Crespo2345% gamesnot enough data
Todd Haines + Greg Haack314 matchesnot enough data
Kyle Webb + Dave Measley224 matchesnot enough data
Kyle Webb + Jorge Crespo134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jorge Crespo
38W–67L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Greg Haack
126W–78L career · 9 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Kyle Webb
174W–101L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
Todd Haines
78W–42L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Clayton Burkle
112W–79L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Mike Ritze
177W–103L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Dave Measley
105W–113L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Rodolfo Aguilera
121W–49L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Mike Madoffori
76W–54L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Mark Broerman
40W–78L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Bryan Ulery
23W–46L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Christopher Bennington
41W–23L career · 6 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
3
Cecil Mullins
69W–86L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Michael Dadaian
67W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
Stephen Ward
42W–58L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.